Fun

RBG Dead: Open Discussion

Reaction

The most reliably wrong SCOTUS Justice, perhaps ever, has died. RBG needs to be shown the same mercy as was shown Scalia by the left when he died.

Yet it’s odd that in an avowed Culture War, with our enemy avowing our destruction, many praise the enemy’s dead general.

Suck it, Chucky. New Justice now! Don’t give in to their “play fair” arguments. They never play fair.

“Hey! Stop shooting!”

Are you talking to me?

“Yes, you. Aren’t you a conservative? You’re supposed to be religious and pray for me.”

But you’re a soldier in an invading army shooting at me.

“I don’t have to be nice. You do. Or you’re not a real conservative.”

pew!~pew!~pew!

See? Even Hillary knows who to blame.

The lady-cucks have already began clucking.

She’s not the only premature surrenderer.

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1307118654908227586

It’s going to be rough, because many on GOP are controlled opposition. Self-controlled, that is.

Fun thread:

One of many figures on the left threatening violence if they don’t get their way.

In case he deletes it, it read (sans asterisks) “If they even TRY to replace RBG we burn the entire f******g thing down.” According to his website, “Reza Aslan is a renowned writer, commentator, professor, Emmy-nominated producer, and scholar of religions.” Professor. What do you know.

Acting in accordance with the law is now “theft”.

The weeping and lamentations from the wrong side have been sweet.

GOP Cucks Or Man’s Up?

The GOP cucks or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, the left will be distracted all the way through election day fighting a losing battle against Trump’s pick (I volunteer my services). It will create a wave of ennui and reduce their turnout. It is therefore the best strategy.

Which is probably why the GOP will cuck. Cucking is all they know. This will force the election to be in large part about SCOTUS, which will energize the left, at least somewhat. Biden’s handlers will have to say who they’d pick without saying who specifically.
Would they be tempted to say “It’s time we had a transman transblack transable transsane Supreme Court justice!”? Sure would please the lunatic, which is to say, new left. The legacy left won’t dare squawk, even if they suspect this is so much persiflage. The sane on the right would believe it, though, and turn out in larger numbers.

Which means Biden’s handlers would probably have him say “We can’t let Trump pick”, and leave it vague.

Ginsburg Was Evil

Stenberg v. Carhart Gonesburg argued, in effect, that a Nebraska law banning partial birth abortion violated women’s rights. He argued stressed the baby would be “nonviable”, an academic term having no meaning regarding life. If the baby is dead, it can’t be born, and its corpse can morally be removed from its mother. If the baby is not dead, allowing it to partially squirt out its mother so that its throat can be cut by a quack is murder. Which RBG was in favor of.

United States v. Virginia The Virginia Military Institute allowed only men, but Gonesburg, evidently anxious to inflict women on the military, said male-only colleges like VMI violated the Equal Protection Clause. The next time we saw reasoning as poor as this was Gorsuch (a “conservative”) discovering trannies in the Constitution.

Obergefell v. Hodges During arguments which discovered yet another hidden “right” in the Constitution, Gonesburg said “Marriage was a relationship of a dominant male to a subordinate female”. But she said it as if it were a bad thing. However, it was the appalling Kennedy (a “conservative”) who wrote the majority opinion.

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Gonesburg wanted the avowedly Christian company to violate its convictions and pay for employee’s contraception products. Because they are employers—and because Gonesburg hated children, we can only suppose. This was one she lost, however.

The number of “equality” cases RBG argued for are without number. She did more damage here than anywhere else. One of her more infamous quotations is “Sex, like race, is a visible, immutable characteristic bearing no necessary relationship to ability.” This is false, even laughably false. But it is desired to be true by many, and desire outweighs truth often.

Your thoughts?

To support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal (in any amount) click here

Categories: Fun

74 replies »

  1. No question RBG did the work of the devil. Her death at this time was most opportune. God has has give us a helping hand. Trump now has his trump card. How he plays it will determine whether he wins or loses. And whether we win or lose.

  2. Keep in mind that Supreme Court seats are regarded as belonging to __xxxx____ identity group.

    Ginsburg was a two-fer.

    The vast majority of Republican senators owe their allegiance to the hostile foreign power which controls one of the deceased’s identity groups.

    Those nominal Republicans, neo-conmen, will dance to whatever music is playing, but they’ll dance with the one who brung ’em. Watch as the neo-conmen execute rhetorical cartwheels to justify whatever course of action they’re told to follow.

  3. Well, as that dear saint said: “God doesn’t need our strategies”, meaning, “do good, disregard talk about the methods…”. Of course, you can’t be a reckless idiot, but that advice is valid: don’t overthink stuff, do what you clearly have to do. On the other hand, this is a subject that can NOT be portrayed following tag-lines or model [instead of reality]-lines (ideology). It is about the kids, to hinder the train of the 50 million mothers killing their babies a year. This is a matter of stopping satan in his work of corrupting 4 year olds telling them boys have vaginas and girls weewees. It’s a war of apocalyptic significance as Sr. Lucía of Fatima told cardinal Caffarra (the final battle is for the family). Finally, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a bad person, a bad woman, this world is better without her, especially, women… But we are not like our enemy, we belong to that who IS Love and ipsum Bonus subsistens, Good itself, we don’t belong to hatred or gnostic rejection of reality and The One who gave it its order. We belong to That that, on the Cross, forgave those killing Him for giving life to the dead, the One that was pure Goodness and gentleness. So, we fight, for the good and noble and decent, but we have mercy: I hope she repented on time, so she had the opportunity to receive God’s infinite mercy. He wants to save us all, and His merits are infinitely bigger than our sins, even those of RBG… So, I hope she pays for her evil works and fruits, I hope we can overcome and overide those; but Requiem eternam dona ei, Domino, et lux perpetua luceat ei; requiescat in pace, Amen.

  4. Nothing’s going to happen until after the election. The RINO caucus won’t let it happen. Perhaps the best possible outcome would be that Collins and Alexander might vote to confirm (Murkowski and Romney have already said no) and then Pence could break a tie, but I highly doubt that is even an option.

    Politically, it might be good for Trump’s chances to name a replacement but hold off on formally submitting it until after the election, but that’s not the way the constitution is supposed to work and it’s taking a chance on something that’s incredibly vital.

    That being said, do you think if the places were reversed, the dems would hold off if they they had both the senate and the presidency? You think ANY of the current democrats today would have pledged in advance not to vote for whomever Obama threw out there to replace Scalia? Hell no.

    It’s cucks all the way down in the GOP and this is a perfect example of what people mean when they say the dems want to win more the GOP.

  5. As far as Ginsburg goes, there wasn’t an ounce of principle in her shriveled up body. All she cared about was the result, the legal reasoning always came second. Did she ever break ranks and vote with the other side on a split decision on a big case? Never. Her vote was always in the can when they needed it.

    To be fair, there were a handful of times she did switch sides in some lower profile cases, but do you know what she was voting for every single time? A bigger more intrusive state. Expanded power of the government.

    Goodbye and good riddance.

  6. Trump needs to give the seat to a white, Christian man. A God-fearing, fire-breathing, bible-thumping he-man like John the Baptist. That would frost the Devil.

  7. Ding, dong, the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead!

    Now if only the moral munchkins of the senate would have the intestinal fortitude to do the right thing and accept a real American to replace her.

  8. “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” So Chuck Schumer believes the last election was done by gerbils and humans were not involved. Delusional, at best. Totally psychotic, most likely. People did have a voice and told the old coot they don’t like his stupidity and cruelty.

    Murkowski is a lying piece of crap democrat too cowardly not to lie to win an election and her constituents are as stupid as those who voted “R” and got a transsexual, Satan-worshipping cop-hater BLM “it” on the ballot as an“R” for SHERIFF because Republicans are morons too.

    Mitt is trying to compete with Murdowski for a better place in Hell. He’s a bitter loser, coward and evil. Again, think tranny, Satan-worshipper with an “R” after its name, supporting the BLM. Hateful man. (Yes, the tranny is my hero. It pointed out the complete idiocy of ALL voters. Suck it up Republicans–you’re as stupid as Dems, whether you admit it or not.)

    As far a burning the whole thing down, they already are, so it’s a really, really, really stupid threat. Satanism IS a religion, by the way. There’s already a war. You CANNOT top the idiocy you’re already involved in. Go home, give it up and accept the “Stupid of the Decade” award.

    Democrats recognize NO law—murder, arson, theft, looting, etc are all LEGAL if it helps the cause. Democrat=anarchist.

    I’m female and thought the mini-twit on the court was one of the worst things for America ever. So women, shut the hell up and stop trying to speak for others that think you are flaming, crying, stupid, worthless, vile things like you are. Not all women, though fewer by the minute, are stupid, emotional, fools out to destroy humanity out of revenge and bitterness. Some have brains and use them.

    They have known for some time now Ginsburg was close to death. The media lied about her being fine (gasp!). Trump had already started mentioning Supreme Court nominees. You just thought it was for the election. See how clueless you are????

  9. Dean: Revolutionary ANYTHING has no place in a civilized society and most certainly not on the top court in the land. You end up with the court replacing Congress and making laws–like they do now. Anti-semitic remarks show how evil one really is inside. I agree a male needs to be appointed, only because women were handed law degrees specifically to destroy this country. You can’t stop it without getting rid of the women.

  10. Trump should appoint a male Christian to replace that dead person who was, let’s face it, just a bunch of cells.

    Do it today and to hell with “fair”

    Don’t play fair Trump.

    Like Al Davis of the Oakland Raiders used to say “Just win, Baby”

  11. “… this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

    (*sigh*) Chucky’s still here. Quite a slip there. Either he thinks the (*ahem*) Harris-Biden team will be elected or he’s willing to wait at least four more years.

  12. Even without Murkowski or Romney a SCOTUS nominee would would result in a tie in the senate thenVP Pence would cast the deciding vote.

    I say go for it. Nominate Amy Coney Barrett.

    We may never get another chance at somehow limiting abortion.

  13. No ACB! I believe she has 5 of her own kids and adopted 3 Africans. Something not quite right there.

    White Christian male. Go for the jugular.

    Repubs will cuck. Another own-goal.

  14. Good Riddance
    I come to bury Ruth, not to praise her.

    She was an anti-American, and by that I mean her ideals were not informed by the Framers, the Founders, the Constitution which she had no allegiance to.
    And she judged accordingly, guided by her personal preferences and not the spirit or intent of the Constitution.

    There are many innocent people who have died today that I will mourn.
    They were babies in the womb who were murdered with the approval of this evil woman.

    I am not glad she is dead. But I am glad that she is gone.
    Anyone with an ounce of humanity would have retired to enjoy her final days with family rather than clinging to a position as she clung to life, hoping to deny an opportunity to replace her by the man elected by the people to do so.

    She spat in our face on the way out.

    Now, we have two, perhaps three if you count Pierre Delecto, Republican senators who will not stand up for the nation.

    So may God see to the re-election of President Trump.

  15. I’m certain she will be voting by mail to ensure Trump has a lesser chance of replacing her.

    Though knowing what Conservatives are like, wouldn’t be the first time a ‘conservative’ on the bench rules in favour of progressives because ‘reasons.’

  16. As SCOTUS Justice Ruth Badass Ginsburg hired 119 clerks during her 27 years as a Justice

    One of the 119 was black

    Why didn’t your media tell you this?

    Jews own the media

    If a Christian SCOTUS justice did that she’d have been routinely labeled a racist

    ABS saw the facts in a Steve Sailer column

  17. Jerry: Two kids, no adoptions.

    Johnno: Probably voted early.

    Michael: Ted Cruz says he is not going that route.

  18. Dan. If you disagree with her personal opinions Sheri becomes angry and accusative

    It’s her go to move- it’s also her only move

    She is to thought what Ruth Bader Ginsburg was to pulchritude

  19. Sir, you quoted Ginsburg as “Sex, like race, is a visible, immutable characteristic bearing no necessary relationship to ability.” Putting aside the issue of “ability” I think we can and should all agree with the former Justice that indeed “Sex, like race, is a visible, immutable characteristic”, so what is this transgenderism thing then? Mutilation does not change sex, instead we can freely change grammatical gender only and why that should ever be a judicial issue? Case closed…

  20. Carlos JCG: well said. RGB will get the reward God chooses. No one knows the Mind of God.

    As usual, the issue that rises to the top is abortion. 63 million dead babies in the US alone since RvW. Trending down, which is good, but still in the 800,000 per year range. There will be 5 to 10 times as many abortion deaths as there will be ChiFlu deaths this year (depending on who is counting the latter).

    RBG was a baby brain sucker. Brigg’s description of partial birth abortion is imprecise. The babies’ throats are not cut. A hole is punched in the baby’s skull while in the birth canal and then her brains are aspirated. Regular forceps cannot be used to remove the dead baby because her cranium is shrunken from her brains being sucked out. A tool more akin to vice grips are used. Then the dead baby is placed on a plastic sheet and gutted open so her organs can be removed and sold to people who wish to “experiment” with them. But not for a profit — that would be wrong, a sin against Karl Marx. The rest of the carcass is thrown into a bio-hazard bag and disposed somewhere, in the trunk of the abortionist’s car in some instances.

    The degree of sheer evil is unfathomable to most people. They can’t get their brains around it (ha ha, a joke, get it?). Yet that is what RBG claimed was a “right” enshrined in the US Constitution. A right for a pregnant minority woman (or girl) and for the abortion industry, but not for the babies.

    People forget that our first Black Muslim president made his reputation by promoting partial birth abortion in Black inner city neighborhoods.

    RGB’s death is not something to celebrate. That would be perverse. But it is something to be thankful for. Her work on this planet was grossly evil. May her memory and her ilk be forever condemned.

  21. Good riddance. A shame to see so many GOP cucks already bailing on confirming a Replacement before election, but this is why they always lose even in times when they’ve had control of Presidency and both houses of Congress (I said for years then that the GOP should have expanded the Court and pushed through a handful of nominees explicitly dedicated to overturning Roe and other egregious precedents. Anything introduce chaos in the system and explode the notion that the Court is not political but some neutral arbiter of transcendent legal principles would be good).

    We know what the Dems would do in in control of Senate (and what they will do if they get the Presidency and Senate again) so the GOP should not hesitate one bit to use its power now. The mistake they made in 2016 was claiming that refusing to vote to confirm Garland was a matter of high principle in an election year that should be some sort of permanent election year standard (Graham even said in an interview post-2016 that if a vacancy occurs in 2020 they’d wait until after election – the kind of milquetoast cuck response that again ensures GOP loses). They should have simply portrayed it as what it was – a pure smash-mouth politics power-play. Obama didn’t have control of the senate and the votes needed then, they did, so too bad for Barry. The GOP may (iffy because of sweasels like Murkowski, Romney, et al.) have the votes now, so too bad again for the Dems if they can get a Trump nominee through before election. Enough of the GOP playing nicey-nicey “our norms and procedures,” Frenchist BS. Time to go for the throat.

    The Democrats are already threatening more riots and mayhem if they loses the election, and have ramped up the terror blackmail language in the wake of RBG’s death if Trump “even tries” to nominate a replacement. The GOP must not give in to this blackmail effort to prevent them doing the job they were elected to do.

    The only saving grace is that RBG was the most extreme Left justice, so even if Biden gets to pick her replacement it won’t change the balance of the Court, yet. The real problem will come if GOP loses Senate and Presidency and the Dems either try to pack the court through expansion, or Biden just gets a replacement or two down the road from the loss of a current more rightward justice.

    That’s why I’m wondering if, under the circumstances, it might be a wiley and mind-blowing move for Trump to nominate Merrick Garland as a sort of hedge against GOP losing Presidency, Senate, or both. He’s not an ideal GOP nominee by any means (but how have Gorsuch, Roberts, and others through the years turned out? 50-50 at best), but he’s not as extreme Left as RBG was, or her Biden-Harris appointed replacement would be, so it would still result in a relative shift of the court center-right, staving off a worse disaster. It would also have the merit of allowing us to watch Democrat heads explode! If they opposed him, it would just expose the Left as the unprincipled opponents of absolutely anything at all Trump does, no matter what, even re-nominating Obama’s own pick. Could be a win-win proposition perhaps. And it’s the kind of crazy counter-intuitive political move Trump revels in – and that might work.

  22. Offer prayer anyway, in case she repented and is in Purgatory.

    Also re: “… But we are not like our enemy, we belong to that who IS Love and ipsum Bonus subsistens, Good itself, we don’t belong to hatred or gnostic rejection of reality and The One who gave it its order. We belong to That that, on the Cross, forgave those killing Him for giving life to the dead, the One that was pure Goodness and gentleness”

    Hoping all is well with Jesus Christ and you, Mr. Guerra. I have seen that kind of language before, and that one who used it, did not, perhaps could not, say the Name of Jesus Christ due to influences. The names used, were “the Light of the World”, “the One”, “God”, and such like, but not the Name of Jesus Christ.

    If all is well, then the paragraph ought to read:
    “….we belong to God Who is Love… and Who is: Ipsum-Himself Bonus-Good… subsistens-substance-essence…. to God Who alone is good as Jesus Christ told to us. And also, We belong to Jesus Christ, Who on the Cross, forgave those who were killing Him and Who because He is Lord, King, and Saviour, gave and gives life to all who are willing to receive His Life, for Jesus Christ is God.

    God bless, C-Marie

  23. I am sad for her family. That’s the disclaimer, right?

    Now, in the world we had to deal with her, I am glad she is out of the picture. Proceed with selecting a new judge, now. Anything less is just becoming the sentimentalist fools the Democrats are. Would they graciously withdraw if the shoe was on the other foot? Hell no!

    Nor is is being callous or whatever you want to call it to do so. Apologies not necessary.

    Did Trump’s term end when she died? No? So PROCEED.

    I am sick and tired of being bullied by a bunch of damn nitwits.

  24. I thought the “dying wish” thing was a clever move on RGB’s part. But then I remembered how the libs pestered her to retire when Obama was in office, and she was having none of it. Her refusal to retire was a pleasant surprise at the time, given her poor health; thankfully, she had a selfish streak and put her personal desires ahead of the long-term success of her ideology. Viewed in that light, her dying wish rings hollow – motivated by guilt, she was trying to have it both ways, after the fact.

    Trump should definitely put up a nominee before the election. His base will be demoralized if he doesn’t, and if he can get his nominee confirmed before the election, it will be an atomic bomb attack on lib enthusiasm.

    I agree with Sheri – the “burn the whole thing down” is comically stupid. I’d contribute to a GoFundMe campaign to buy matches. And as far as a war, that would only happen if the rioters dared tread outside their coddling zone. Even then, their numbers are so minuscule it would be a very short war.

  25. I said many names of God, the Son, the Logos, the second Person of the Holy Trinity, incarnated, and took the name of Jesus, God saves, He is the One we belong to. What’s the problem, then, with what I said? He is Goodness itself, the Eternal, ipsum Esse subsistens, the Christ, the Son of man, Son of David, Prince of Peace, Love, God’s Wisdom…. Jesus Christ, our Life

  26. Beautiful!! Thank you!! It was the use of the and that instead of Jesus’ Name, which gave concern.
    God bless, C-Marie

  27. “Dennis – That Merrick Garland idea is deviously brilliant. I love it. Won’t happen, but it’s genius.”

    Given that Trump is indeed a stable genius, I’m thinking choosing a Clinton appointee and Obama nominee as his next SCOTUS appointment is probably not the way to go.

  28. It is ironic that RBG was, at least in part, possessed of a Nazi Ideology for it was the Nazi’s who designated some Germans as Lebensunwertes Leben – Life unworthy of life.

    She, like many black-robed tyrants before her, washed her robes red in the blood of defenseless innocents.

    Trump has promised his followers he would only nominate pro life judges.

    If he cucks, he justly goes down to defeat

  29. Reading some of the comments, I can only pray to the Jew, Jesus Christ, our Lord, that He send the Holy Ghost to those on the right and left who hate; that the Holy Ghost inspire them to follow Matt 5:44 and 1 John 4:11-13.

  30. Are there constitutional arguments against appointing a new Judge as soon as possible?

    One would expect that Trumps enemies will try go get Trump to do the action that is most harmful to him. So if a Romney and the other RINO’s and almost the entiere Democratic party is against appointing a new Judge, Trump should appoint one as soon as possible. That’s statemanship, isn’t it?

  31. Ok, DAV and Bob, I am suitably shamed. As the Bible says, we should love all our fellow clumps of cells.

  32. Unless Jesus will not accept that He is the Messias, He is not a Jew.

    According to The New Testament Jews are the enemy of all

    Is it your claim that Jesus is the enemy of all?

  33. [14] For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jews,

    vos enim imitatores facti estis, fratres, ecclesiarum Dei, quae sunt in Judaea in Christo Jesu : quia eadem passi estis et vos a contribulibus vestris, sicut et ipsi a Judaeis :

    [15] Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;

    qui et Dominum occiderunt Jesum, et prophetas, et nos persecuti sunt, et Deo non placent, et omnibus hominibus adversantur,

    [16] Prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles, that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end.

    prohibentes nos gentibus loqui ut salvae fiant, ut impleant peccata sua semper : pervenit enim ira Dei super illos usque in finem.
    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Keep up the good work Zionists

  34. DAV, she is dead. No amount of gloating or tears will change that – but my point is that it’s the political perspective we are looking at.
    Changing strategy because an opposition leader dies is simply foolhardy.
    So to be sure, express your condolences, but alter your course because she died?

  35. Sadner: “Are there constitutional arguments against appointing a new Judge as soon as possible? ”

    No, there is no constitutional argument against it. Plenty of justices historically have been nominated and confirmed during election years, some even during lame duck sessions post–election but before the next inaugural.

    But, keep in mind that President does not “appoint” a Supreme Court justice, but nominate one who must be confirmed by the Senate (the part Democrats seemed to forget when they got into such a tizzy in 2016).

    Which leads us to the next art of our post above: “One would expect that Trumps enemies will try go get Trump to do the action that is most harmful to him. So if a Romney and the other RINO’s and almost the entire Democratic party is against appointing a new Judge, Trump should appoint one as soon as possible.”

    It’s not clear what your actual position is, since the first sentence seems to contradict your conclusion that he should nominate a new justice in the face of RINO and Democrat opposition. But, it’s the RINOs who are the real problem, for the reason I pointed out above on the difference between “appointing” and “nominating.” If he can’t rely on his own party to stay united and get his nominee confirmed, then he’s sunk.

  36. Dear Bob

    Luke 19:27 But as for those my enemies, who would not have me reign over them, bring them hither, and kill them before me

    That means that Jesus is telling all that those who do not accept Him as Messias will end up in Hell

  37. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans Chapters 9-11, particularly 11:25-32.

    O, yeah. Well, compare that to Luke where there is no future time of a mass conversion noted

    Luke And they shall fall by the edge of the sword; and shall be led away captives into all nations; and Jerusalem shall be trodden down by the Gentiles; till the times of the nations be fulfilled. [25] And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, by reason of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves;

    [26] Men withering away for fear, and expectation of what shall come upon the whole world. For the powers of heaven shall be moved; [27] And then they shall see the Son of man coming in a cloud, with great power and majesty. [28] But when these things begin to come to pass, look up, and lift up your heads, because your redemption is at hand.

    XXXXXXXXXXXX

    The New Testament must be read and understood in its entirety

  38. Dear Bob. You are making a claim based upon the Jews as a race but Jesus told the Jews who would not accept Hm that their father is the devil;

    You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. [45] But if I say the truth, you believe me not

    The Covenants came with both Blessings and Curses but men like you only want to treat of blessings, not curses.

    Thus, because of your unacknowledged surrender to the ideology racial supremacism, you think the Jews Qua Jews will be saved. The Jews embody what they putatively hated most, the ideology of Aryan racial supremacy; The Jews are racial supremacists.

    Simple question Sir. Does one to accept that Jesus is Lord and Saviour and be Baptized to be saved or do you just have to be of the Jewish race?

  39. Dear Bob. Because you are asked questions you are unwilling or unable to answer does not mean those asking you questions hate you.

    You prolly do not even realise your response is an attempt at emotional manipulation, do you

    As the kids say, whatever.

  40. Dennis, thanks.

    My position is that the law should be followed. If the law does not forbid an immediate nomination, Trump should nominate as soon as it is politically a good idea. Congress will then appoint when it is for them politically a good idea. All within the confines of the law.

    This is after all what everybody does. Even dictators, as they get to write the law.

  41. RBG was supposed to have been Jewish. She was not even buried according to Jewish law. I would also be interested in knowing how many observant Jews sat Shiva for her. Amazing how many nice things they for someone after they pass as if if will enable them to appear with the saints before the real highest court.

  42. Dear Donald. ABS saw Shannon Bream (sp), the legal correspondent for For News, interviewed by Tucker Carlson on his show. She spoke in glowing terms of the execrable woman and praised her as an inspiration and role mode for all.

    Bream is a type of fish.

    Tucker knows on which side his bagel is schmeared…He listened silently, smiled and nodded and thanked Bream

    O, and Fox News will no longer mention George Soros because, well you know… Newt Gingrich was castigated for identifying Gorge Soros as complicit in the riots and cancel culture and Harrison Faulkner (sp?) on her show – Outnumbered? – said there was no need to bring him up.

    Newt caught on right away O, this is now verboten? or words to that effect; but he did say verboten

  43. God takes us from this earth when He wills. Now He has allowed an opening for SCOTUS to be filled with a true Christian. Will that take place? The leaders of the Democrat party want the killing, the murders of the boys and girls in the womb to continue unabated. Some have clearly said that the population of the world must decrease. Why?

    It is said that on October 3, 2020, Pope Francis will sign a new Encyclical promoting nature, creation, and humanism. He is for One World Government, but also has said countries ought to keep their identities. We will see soon enough.

    God, alone, is Judge. Pray for those who do not yet believe. And if the gifts of the graces of repentance and of Faith in Jesus Christ are utterly refused…eternal condemnation takes place. But God alone, knows the heart.

    We are to witness to Jesus Christ, and to condemn evil actions … the killing of boys and girls in the womb, and the just born, and much more. But we pray as led of by the Holy Spirit, for those who support such heinous actions as some, many, most? can be saved by Christ.

    To apply to all, those whose hearts, which Jesus knew, are the hearts of present day Jews, is beyond our ability to make, as the depths of their hearts are known to God alone.

    God bless, C-Marie

  44. I hope everyone is following J.E. Dyer’s posts at Liberty Unyielding. Jennifer E. Dyer is a former naval intelligence officer and a very careful analyst. That is why the following is so alarming.

    For this is the first time I’ve seen her lay out the case, and state unambiguously, that the Democratic Party is not seriously focusing either on RBG’s replacement, or even on the November election.

    Instead, she writes today (September 21) that the Democrats’ dead serious 2020 plan is an absolutely not-kidding Permanent Coup, and they — meaning up to and including the highest ranking elected members of the Democratic Party and former President Obama, who she names as the one who is and will be really running the show — do not care how that is accomplished, just as long as it is, via a Bolshevik-style revolution if necessary.

    This is not the sort of language that dispassionate, scrupulously fair, former naval intelligence officer J.E. Dyer throws around willy-nilly. Most importantly, she lays out the reasons why pretending that we are still in Kansas guarantees that we will lose:

    To define [the Democratic Party’s] purpose as “winning the election” is to lag the OODA loop and never catch up with it, much less “get inside” it. The view from inside the Democrats’ OODA loop is this one: come what may, they don’t intend to lose their bid to regain the levers of power. That’s a more accurate reading of the end-state they have in mind.

    There’s much more at the link.

  45. 2 Samuel 14:14.1 We each must die and disappear like water poured out on the ground. But God doesn’t take our lives (make any exceptions). Instead, he figures out ways of bringing us back when we run away [Contemporary English Version]

    2 Samuel 14:14.2 We shall all die; we shall be like water that is spilt on the ground and lost; but God will spare the man who does not set himself to keep the outlaw in banishment [Revised English Version (Oxford)]

  46. Dear C Marie. Both The Old Testament and New Testament teach us to mark hetetics and avoid them

    Are those repetitive teachings in error or superfluous?

    Of course, all who die will stand before The Judgment Seat of Christ who ultimately decides the eternal state of the dead man but living man can surely identify those Men still living who accept or reject God, accept or reject Jesus, right?

    Jews reject The Messias, they think Jesus was the bastard child of Mary who was raped by a Roman Soldier while she was menstruating and that Jesus was justly crucified fir blasphemy and is now in Hell for all eternity submerged in boiling shit.

    That’s a bit much even in this insane epoch of ecumenism and if you can’t decide whether or not Jews who align their own selves with this malign ideological anti Christian hatred can be shunned or rejected while alive then you are not worthy of being considered a member of The Church Militant

    Pope Benedict XVI publicly stated the Church ought not try to convert Jews but that is to reject The Great Commission of Jesus and that is the worst possible of all forms of anti Semitism because the unconverted Jew is choosing to live apart from Jesus – one colloquial description of Hell

  47. ?
    The information regarding Benedict XVI and anti-semitism, is incorrect, and Benedict has refuted it.

    In 2008, Benedict changed the wording of the Good Friday prayer in its Latin form from prauing for those perfidious Jews, to “…that our God and Lord may illuminate their (the hearts of Jews) their hearts, that they acknowledge Jesus Christ is the Saviour of all men.” This prayer was widely viewed as giving approval to evangelize the Jewish people.

    And think on this. Jesus Himself said that He had come to the Jews. He Himself worked to evangelize Israel. He was killed for His evangelizing and for confirming that He is the Son of God. He sent us to do the same evangelization and to the gentiles, too.

    Jesus said for us to count the cost before following Him.

    Catholics are to honor the Jewish faith in the Old Covenant but are to witness to Jesus Christ in the New Covenant, for Jesus is the Messiah for Whom Judaism has longed. And so it all becomes a matter of faith.

    31Behold the days shall come, saith the Lord, and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Juda: 32Not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers, in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt: the covenant which they made void, and I had dominion over them, saith the Lord. 33But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith the Lord: I will give my law in their bowels, and I will write it in their heart: and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying: Know the Lord: for all shall know me from the least of them even to the greatest, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
    Jeremiah 31: 31-34.

    26And whilst they were at supper, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and broke: and gave to his disciples, and said: Take ye, and eat. This is my body. 27And taking the chalice, he gave thanks, and gave to them, saying: Drink ye all of this. 28For this is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins. 29And I say to you, I will not drink from henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I shall drink it with you new in the kingdom of my Father.
    Matthew 26: 26-29.

    God bless, C-Marie

  48. Dear Marie. In his trilogy, Jesus of Nazareth, Pope Benedict XVI not only said The Church should not try to convert Jews but he also said there is error in the Gospel re “His blood be upon us”

    He claims that could not be accurate…

    Yes, a Pope stating publicly a Gospel is teaching error

    As to the claim there is anti semitism here it would be nice if just once- just one time- the person making that accusation would define what that means

    The anti Semitic accusation is a rhetorical bomb intended to blow up any factual discussion involving Jews or Israel

    It is on the meaningless level of Diversity is out strength or Ignorance is our strength

  49. My thoughts? Oh I didn’t care for RBG’s politics. She helped the Supreme Court legislate licensed gay marriage. And regardless of whether you’re fine with gay marriage or not, or whatever your stance might be, it matters not when it comes to honestly interpreting the Constitution. It was a very unconstitutional move on her part along with the majority in the Supreme Court to make gay marriage into law. Nothing in the Constitution grants a right to licensed gay marriage or straight marriage as far as that goes. But if you’re a leftist that doesn’t care about the Rule of Law, then you think that the Supreme Court ought to operate as superseding legislature and not as interpreter of the Constitution. And yes, she was pro-abortion as you note Briggs, which again, isn’t granted by the Constitution and is something that should NOT be legal within any republic or ordered government.

  50. Bob K, I have missed your posts and comments.
    Hope you are well and that your daughter’s still well?

    I remember that you did some work in a prison teaching the inmates about miracles.
    Matthew chapter 25also gives mention of that…Since we’ve been recently discussing the notions of “good works” versus ‘Grace alone”

    Intuitively the answer is obvious if you have a. heart and a brain at the same time and nobody’s been tinkering with inappropriate rusty equipment which they fail to clean.

    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
    It’s Tin man AND scarecrow, not either or.
    “…and Todoe’ too?”
    “Yes, Toto too!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *