It is clear that in @UKLabour unless you agree from the outset that TWAW and TMAM, then you will be marked as transphobic and shut down.
That’s not how it works is it? pic.twitter.com/ZNwiBSf1np
— LeonoraChristina (@JammersMinde) February 17, 2020
Don’t miss the point where she said “A child isn’t born with a sex.”
Colin Wright, a scientist and man of the left, reacted to that video saying “More overt sex denialism. Labour Party politician Dawn Butler states on TV that children are ‘born without a sex.’ This isn’t some esoteric and benign academic theory. This is becoming MAINSTREAM and codified into law! Ignore it and stay silent at your own peril.”
This tickled me, and I responded, “I find rather adorable the reaction of scientists on the left when they realize the mob has suddenly come for them. They always are surprised the Fantasy-Reality line didn’t stop at their specialty. Welcome to the fight, Colin!”
I say Wright is left because of the next item, which doesn’t at first seem to be a Doom item. It’s a Wall Street Journal op ed written by Wright and one Emma Hilton.
Transgender ideology harms women, gays—and especially feminine boys and masculine girls.
…Yet it’s one thing to claim that a man can “identify” as a woman or vice versa. Increasingly we see a dangerous and antiscientific trend toward the outright denial of biological sex….reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time.
And so on, giving all the arguments with which regular readers are familiar. Then this, the reason for Doom.
Denying the reality of biological sex and supplanting it with subjective “gender identity” is not merely an eccentric academic theory. It raises serious human-rights concerns for vulnerable groups including women, homosexuals and children.
Women have fought hard for sex-based legal protections. Female-only spaces are necessary due to the pervasive threat of male violence and sexual assault…
The denial of biological sex also erases homosexuality, as same-sex attraction is meaningless without the distinction between the sexes. Many activists now define homosexuality as attraction to the “same gender identity” rather than the same sex. This view is at odds with the scientific understanding of human sexuality. Lesbians have been denounced as “bigots” for expressing a reluctance to date men who identify as women. The successful normalization of homosexuality could be undermined by miring it in an untenable ideology.
Wright, when he wrote this, anyway, didn’t understand tranny madness is a direct outgrowth of welcoming homosexuals, and the classifying women as both equal and simultaneously weak. The “successful normalization of homosexuality” has had devastating consequences. Which also, since Wright is an evolutionist, a strange thing, because of course homosexuality is extremely dysgenic. And therefore harmful to the species.
Anyway, to his great credit, the now-startled Wright has been unearthing some excellent Doom items, the picture heading today’s post being one of them. “Graduate student applications at UC Santa Cruz ask not only about your gender identity, but about how masculine/feminine you present. While voluntary, this seems like an extremely odd thing to ask.”
Not odd in the least. A good way to target normals so that they can be bullied into professing belief in fantasy over Reality.
It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.
I’d say rather ideology ignores facts. Virtue signal: of course eugenics for humans doesn’t work. Why, a white couple from Norway is equally likely to have a white as a black baby. Sex for babies doesn’t exist, so neither does race. Or any other trait.
Okay, enough of that. Dawkins went on to disclaim any sympathy for systematic human eugenics, but it was too late, of course. The mob descended upon him.
It’s clear that we would never want scientists in charge of any kind of official government-based eugenics push. Scientists are just as prone to madness as anybody else, maybe even more so. Their powers to do good are matched by their ability to destroy. Consider how many human beings they flush down the toilet in IVF and during the testing for genetic diseases. The flushing is labeled a “treatment” or “cure”. What if we advocated that same cure for the common cold?
No. No official eugenics ever. Even forgetting the morality, the over-certainty of genetics models alone is enough justification to ban it. On the other hand, it’s also beyond absurd to deny what we can call practical eugenics, which many of you practiced when you picked your mates.
Clergy are required to report abuse heard in confession or face up to three years in prison.
“[WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!]” said Attorney-General Jill Hennessy.
The Children Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 followed a recommendation in the 2017 final report of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse that mandatory reporting laws no longer provide an exemption for clergy, nor for sacramental confession.
The new laws also ensure the disclosures are not exempt under the Failure to Disclose Offence in the Crimes Act and allows survivors of institutional abuse to apply to the courts to have their unfair historical compensation payments overturned.
What the female Attorney-General actually said was “From [today], our promise to put the safety of children ahead of the secrecy of the confession is in full effect and there is no excuse for people who fail to report abuse.”
This is a law worth breaking. Priests must become criminals. Priests, like us, will not be allowed to use the excuse “I was just following orders.”
NHS to deny health care to homophobes
Tweet: “Homophobic, sexist and racist patients could be barred from non-emergency care at NHS trusts, under new rules from April”.
That lead to this headline: NHS staff can refuse to treat racist or sexist patients under new rules.
Sexist and racist patients could be barred from non-emergency care at NHS trusts, under new rules to be enforced from April.
Currently, staff can refuse to treat non-critical patients who are verbally aggressive or physically violent towards them.
But these protections will extend to any harassment, bullying or discrimination, including homophobic, sexist or racist remarks.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock wrote to all NHS staff on Tuesday to announce stronger measures to investigate abuse and harassment towards staff, saying “no act of violence or abuse is minor”.
Some acts of “violence” or “abuse” are, in fact, minor. And some are not even violent or abusive.
Since in England “homophobia” is, it seems, classified as every behavior and attitude shy of full-throated hysterical acceptance, the hospitals are very soon going to empty out. Or we’ll see a host of folks who had been holding strong abandon their principles, once they get sick.
The leftist singularity is gaining mass, the spiral quickens.
— Hunters (@huntersonprime) February 13, 2020
Warning: not for the squeamish. Example: a blowtorch is applied to a man’s crotch. Plot: Jews and people of color, track down whites “nazis” in the States and brutally murder them.
Spielberg’s daughter, who lives in Nashville, Tenn., has already submitted an application to become a sex worker — and the self-proclaimed “sexual creature” shared in the revealing interview that her famous father is supportive of her endeavors.
According to the aspiring star, the “Schindler’s List” director and his wife, Kate Capshaw, were “intrigued” when she shared the news with them of her new porn gig over the weekend. She added that her parents were “not upset” by her revelation…
The 73-year-old director’s daughter opened up about past abuse by “predators” during her early years by “outsiders” who had no relation to the “Jaws” filmmaker. She’s also been open about her borderline personality disorder.
Wait. You need to get a license in Tennessee to become a whore? Back in the old days of the evil patriarchy, women did this without having to ask for permission. Now in the matriarchy they need to pay a fee. Progress.
But it does make you wonder if all those rumors about this woman’s adoptive father are true…
To support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card or PayPal (in any amount) click here