Half Of Americans Now Transane

New Rasmussen poll “Americans Oppose Transgender Trend in Athletics“, which wins the day for most misleading headline.

Transgender athletes who are biological males are winning at all levels of girls’ and women’s sports these days, and Americans don’t approve.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that just 29% of American Adults favor allowing transgender students to participate on the sports teams of the gender they identify with, letting biological males, for example, play girls’ sports. Fifty-one percent (51%) oppose transgender participation on sports teams of the opposite sex. Twenty percent (20%) are undecided.

In plain language, delusional boys who believe they are girls are kicking girls’ asses and getting away with it because most are now transane or cowards.

Rasmussen has it exactly backwards. Yes, 51% oppose letting boys beat up on girls, and that is “most” in the technical sense. Probably the writer had in mind the Voting Fallacy, where all mortality is decided by elections, a central failing of democracies. If you can eke out one more vote than the other side, your position is moral and theirs immoral.

All these surveys have a plus or minus, in the predictive sense. Meaning it could be true 51% exactly still are sane. Or it could be that it’s less than half, given this sample extrapolated to all Americans might not be especially accurate.

About 30% are already admittedly enthusiastically transane—-trans-sane, as in defining sanity to be other than sane. Thirty percent!

I repeat: Thirty percent! And 20% can’t decide whether Reality remains real. These are the cowards. That adds them to the transane allies camp.

Proof? Here’s the question wording:

1* Do you favor or oppose allowing transgender students to participate on the sports teams of the gender they identify with, letting biological males, for example, play girls’ sports?

2*Transgender athletes who are biological males are winning at all levels of girls’ and women’s sports these days. Is the addition of biological males to girls’ and women’s sports likely to change those sports for the better or the worse? Or will it have no impact?

The good news is that there’s no ambiguity in the wording. “Do you favor…letting biological males…play girls’ sports?” To which 30% say yes, and 20% cuck.

I of course do not care about female sports, and care very little about male sports, either, at the corporate level. It’s organized entertainment for a fee. If you don’t like some rich spoiled fool taking a knee at a football game, don’t watch, don’t give them any money.

But the boys aren’t beating up on girls at the “pro” level. This is school (which most kids would do better skipping after they learn to read, but skip it).

And the sports aren’t the real question, the transanity is. If wrestling, say, were to disappear for girls and become all men, so what. The trannies, because they are mutilating and drugging themselves won’t be able to compete against sane boys and they will disappear. Sports will return to the purview of men alone. Fine.

No. The real problem is the same as with gmarriage.

Remember that the argument used to be, What harm is there letting two men pretend to marry each other? If they want to sodomize themselves silly, in the privacy of their rooms, with one wearing a bridal vale, and the other checking his HIV meds, let them. What’s it matter to you?

I’ll tell you. It’s because they changed the law so that the government forces me, by the point of a financial (and someday real) gun, to say these two men are married.

The government forces sane Americans to become transane, as far as gmarriage goes. I now, in order not to run afoul of the perverted law, must say what is not true. I must swear to it, and act as if Reality isn’t real.

I, and you. We who are ourselves not insane must embrace transanity. By law.

Right now, we must be not-sane on gmarriage, and not yet on men pretending to be women. But does any among you think it won’t happen?

From a couple of months back: 234 House Democrats, Two Republicans Co-Sponsor Bill Forcing Schools To Let Male Athletes Compete On Girls’ Sports Teams.

How long before it is the law of the land that you must use the “pronouns” people insist on? How long before you must say that a man is a woman or pay a price?

How long?

12 Thoughts

  1. Ever notice it is BOYS on girls teams?? Weak, failing boys who are proud they can beat up girls. They are vile, useless creatures.

    In a real sense, humans have this coming. They won’t stand up to evil. They’d rather live in Hell on earth (it ain’t dancing with the Devil, it’s being danced on by the devil, but no one believes that till they have footprints on their back and it’s too late). And they will live in Hell on earth just as they pleaded for. It does tend to make things black and white again…

    It’s already mandatory in some countries to call fantasy reality: England, for example, and North Korea and China and Cuba……

  2. all mortality is decided by elections, a central failing of democracies.

    I think you meant morality, but in some sense this fits as well.

  3. “Probably the writer had in mind the Voting Fallacy, where all ‘mortality’ is decided by elections, a central failing of democracies. If you can eke out one more vote than the other side, your position is moral and theirs immoral.”

    Ok so you meant “morality” in that top sentence. Yeah it’s also known as the bandwagon fallacy.

    The transgenderism, of course, is a load of baloney. It shows how the left has no credibility where they’re promoting mental illness or confusion as a fine life style. But there are some real agendas behind all this and it’s not really about human equality and fairness – equalitarianism is always a kind camouflage of the real agendas behind the left and the leaders that run the left. It’s about more limitations on free speech, a kind of Marxist inspired attempt to undercut traditional moral beliefs in America and other countries and, of course, allow experimentation on human beings and even child abuse in some cases.

  4. The Fems have always bragged they could compete with the boys. I say enjoy the chaos the gals have invited.

    Who cares about girl’s whatever sport…

    The best sport ever invented is golf and one doesn’t require 10s of thousands of paying gawkers to enjoy playing it.

    Golf is like sex in that one doesn’t have to be very good at it to enjoy it.

  5. “How long before it is the law of the land that you must use the “pronouns” people insist on? …or pay a price?”

    New York City says, “hold my beer”…
    https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/hra/downloads/pdf/services/lgbtqi/Gender%20Pronouns%20final%20draft%2010.23.17.pdf

    Yes, there are fines.
    https://nypost.com/2016/05/19/city-issues-new-guidelines-on-transgender-pronouns/
    Much steeper than for many a real crime, as you may notice.

    Just one more excellent reason to leave NY.

  6. Very sad indeed….closer and closer come the clarity of Jesus’ words to,us who are His…..count the cost of following Me…..

    Pray for those youths and more. And use names not pronouns. Not fair by any means…..but these are the beginnings of the build-up for the One World Government and the One World Religion. Have you read the book, Lord Of The World? It is not the best written book, but the story is absolutely compelling concerning the times coming, and it was written in 1907. It is at http://www.gutenberg.org for free.

    Actually, much of this “confusion” being allowed to continue, is the fault of the Catholic Church hierarchy.

    In 1 Corinthians 6: 9-11 : “Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye were washed, but ye were sanctified, but ye were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God.”

    So, the Catholic hierarchy ought to be freeing people by the Love of God and the power of the Holy Spirit, those who identify themselves as LGBTQ or other counterfeits to God’s creation of human beings.

    But this part of the hierarchy’s ministry in public at any rate, has been missing for eons. Even JPII’s catechism says:

    “2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.

    2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.”

    And there is not one word in JPII’s catechism, referring back to the freedom from LGBTQ and more, that those in St. Paul’s time experienced in and through their faith in Christ to live the normal heterosexual life in which they were created.

    During the papacy of Francis, I expect that any changes in ministering to those so affected by the counterfeits, could be costly to members of the hierarchy regarding place, privilege, position, and more.

    And there, arises, Christ’s Words of, count the cost of being His disciple.

    God bless, C-Marie

  7. How about the strategic goal of getting the feminists and transgenderists to fight each other? Getting men in women’s sports to make the women mad seems a good way of achieving this. Revolutions will always eat their children, so get them to fight each as quickly as possible means they don’t have the time to come after you. Especially if you help the loosing party a bit.

  8. Fine with me, I don’t want my daughters to have athletic scholarships, I want them married to white cis-men and raising children. Maybe my sons will call themselves girls and get free rides to STEM degrees. Though I recommend skipping the hormones, surgeries, etc. because that just perpetuates stereotypes. Cis-women aren’t required to take hormones, change their names, wear dresses & makeup, or grow their hair long, so why should trans-women?

    You can’t defeat leftism with rightism, so defeat it with more leftism. Just be sure to get out of Moscow before the Purges start.

  9. “Ever notice it is BOYS on girls teams?? ”

    A F2M case is lacking the years of post puberty training with higher muscle mass and bone density and the continued benefits of Testosterone production.

    They can’t use synthetic androgens because WADA would get them banned…

    Hence they sink without trace…

    In the M2F case there just isn’t enough evidence to frame a handicapping regime to offset the training background and androgen production so the IOC and other bodies have flat out guessed at one. Order beer and pizza and pull up a chair, we’re in for the long haul…

  10. “It’s because they changed the law so that the government forces me, by the point of a financial (and someday real) gun, to say these two men are married.”

    You’re clearly not being forced to say anything of the sort, as the existence of this and many other posts on your blog proves.

    You’re living in a democracy. I’m sure you’d rather live in a Christian theocracy with capital punishment for homosexuality, blasphemy, and transvestitism (but not for women wearing male clothes, presumably), but you don’t. Instead of complaining that you’re losing the argument on these issues, how about coming up with something rational rather than ‘my holy book says homosexuality is a sin’?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *