The Week In Doom — Super Tranny Madness Edition

Item Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

A jury has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.

The jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.

The matriarchy tightens its grip.

Women had been getting away with killing their children for so long that it seemed natural and normal. Now they want to castrate, drug, and mutilate the ones that escape their wombs, so that they, the female creatures, can have a different kind of fashion accessory.

I understand and feel the father’s pain. He has no option, short of violence, and if he went that route, they’d get him.

Folks, you do understand there is no reasoning with these people. Reason for them was left in the rear view mirror twenty years ago, and they speed to their glorious Future. Only they don’t see it’s a cliff.

This is a new civil war. A cold one, but a civil war nonetheless. Brother against brother, father against son, mothers against sanity.

What’s coming, and is now inescapable, is true tyranny. The father in this case is forced to say what is not true. If you cannot speak Truth because Truth is ruled “hate”, dark times are assured. Insanity is law, sanity is illegal.

See this thread:

The Governor of Texas had this:

Listened to an interview with the father. He says the mother used to lock the boy in his room and tell him there’s a monster who only eats little boys. At three, she started dressing him like a girl. Would withhold affection if he wasn’t dressed like a girl.

Update! Judge rules dad will have say in gender ‘transition’ of 7-year-old

Looks like somebody got a call from the governor.

Item Menstrual cycles are for everyone? ‘Always’ removes female symbol from sanitary pads following trans activists’ complaints

Women’s products maker Always is at the center of a fresh feminist v transgender skirmish, after caving in to trans activists’ outrage and removing the ‘discriminatory’ Venus symbol from its packaging.

The company will drop the universally recognized symbol from December, following an onslaught of tweets insisting that women aren’t the only ones who menstruate.

Women are the only ones who menstruate. This is known even to those who say men menstruate. The only thing here that might surprise you, but should not, is how fast a large corporation folded after only a handful of lunatics attacked it.

It’s always the extremes, small groups, who drive politics. This means it does very little good to point to your friends and neighbors, who still constitute a majority, and say “See? It isn’t so bad.” It’s worse. Because your friends and neighbors would also most of them cower before the mob.

Item New York Times tweet:

The deep state isn’t a secret, antidemocratic cabal. It’s a collection of public servants looking to guard the Republic against President Trump’s excesses, writes @mcottle.

Now that the NYT admits what everybody always knew, look for NRO for their “The Conservative Case For The Deep State Article.”

Item Christian Moms Group Slams Period-Proof Underwear Ad: “Men Do Not Menstruate”

The evangelical Christian group One Million Moms (Twitter count: 3757) is furious that a commercial for period-proof underwear features men having periods.

Have you ever heard people say that if men could get pregnant, they wouldn’t dare regulate access to abortion? That premise applies in this commercial for Thinx. The idea is that if men had periods, it would make the subject a lot easier to discuss. The ad shows various boys dealing with the situation, from talking to a dad, to telling his girlfriend he’s on his period while they make out, to asking another guy if he can borrow a tampon.

This is from the “Friendly Atheist”, proving that at least this atheist cannot think rationally.

11 Thoughts

  1. I’m not surprised about Always. They’re a brand of P&G, which brought us the lovely man-hating Gillette commercial. The “tans activists” are probably their own employees.

  2. Would the mother force a real daughter to wear dresses? Being as woke as she is, wouldn’t that be seen as endorsing relics of the patriarchy? Feminists say there is no such thing as dressing like a girl. Trans activists say oh yes there is, the frillier the better. Looks like the feminists have been trumped again.

  3. Women had been getting away with killing their children … Now they want to castrate, drug, and mutilate the ones that escape their wombs, [to] have a different kind of fashion accessory.

    Not a new idea. I vaguely remember something similar in Farnham’s Freehold

  4. Apparently that woman is not the boy’s mother, as the egg was from a egg donor. A new variant on the wicked stepmother theme.

  5. “Only they don’t see it’s a cliff.” Of course they do. They just are of the belief that only their stupid minions will go off the cliff. They are immune.

    Okay, are the athletic cups genderless? Are razors genderless? I mean, come on, NO MORE PINK RAZORS or else. Right?

    Makers of “feminine products” (an aisle that MUST be renamed, of course) were always women hating creatures, out to make female life hell. Nothing has changed, except they now have fake-females to make life hell for.

    The discussion of “if men had periods”, “if men could get pregnant” are stupid, thoughtless garbage that non-thinking XXs toss around because they are too braindead to actually think. If pigs had wings……

  6. “This is from the “Friendly Atheist”, proving that at least this atheist cannot think rationally.”

    How does it prove that? You didn’t give a reason. As usual.

  7. The putative pro life people are pro abortion as they always say that the perp/mom who hired a hitman to kill her chid is also a victim.

    If man hired a hit man to kill his obnoxious whoring around ex-wife, would he be called a victim?

    No. It is only a woman who is described as a victim after she contracts with a baby killer to ice her unwanted baby.

  8. “Okay, are the athletic cups genderless? Are razors genderless?”
    Gender is a term from linguistics and refers to a classification of nouns as masculine, feminine or neuter, depending on the language. Some languages only have two genders. The German language equivalent of cup and razor would indeed have gender. In English, cup and razor are genderless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *