Item The APA now defines manliness as a mental malady.
You wondered what the practical effects of SJWs taking over universities would be. Well, this is as practical as it gets. Since it’s the professional psychological organizations that get to say what’s nuts and what isn’t, and professionals are mostly lodged in social justice towers, isolated from Reality, whatever they say goes. All the higher authorities, like lawmakers and judges rely on what they say. Try getting a word otherwise into their journals. And if you can’t get a word in, what you say doesn’t count, not professionally.
Wright: “Reading through the document you will also see how these terms are connected to the broader feminist conception of patriarchy. Men benefit from, and are victimized by, this omnipotent invisible force that magically shapes their lives.”
The ideology that appears to be driving the academic shrinks is toxic feminism.
Wright (ellipsis original):
I could go on but I want to turn to the consequences of labeling traditional men as toxic. Understand that this document carries the weight of scientific authority. It will be used in the training of clinical psychologists, it will be used to justify programs that target boys who show signs of impending traditional masculinity, and it will be used to justify restrictive policies towards men. Think of how universities, especially the diversity czars, will use this, how the courts will use this in custody hearings, and how workplace training and policies will be affected. The @APA has, in essence, justified… no, it has encouraged, discrimination against men who hold traditional views of masculinity.
Link to APA report.
You laughed when I suggested dropping large rocks from space on colleges, but if we don’t now defund, depopulate, and delegitimize our traditional higher educational system now, we’re soon going to be in really deep kimchi. Because nobody knows how or has the guts to say no to SJWs.