Young offenders up to the age of 25 should be kept out of adult prisons because of “irrefutable evidence” that the typical adult male brain is not fully formed until at least the mid-20s, MPs have said.
The House of Commons justice select committee says young adults, who make up 10% of the adult prison population but account for 30-40% of police time, should be treated differently by the criminal justice system and be held in young offender institutions with 18- to 20-year-olds.
The MPs say that the most recent evidence shows that young people are reaching adult maturity five to seven years later than they did a few decades ago, which is affecting the age at which most typically grow out of crime.
It musn’t be forgotten that MPs have been arguing also to allow 16-year-olds to vote. Because Equality. Even American-grown effeminate soyboys say “Let children vote. Even 13-year-olds.” The reason why people in England are not as mature as previous generations is not far to seek. Neither is it difficult to explain the progressive push to lighten all penalties.
One might imagine that to write an article with this title is presumptuous in the extreme. But I do not make this assertion based on the wicked acts of Martin Luther — his division of Christendom, his hatred of the Jews, his licensing of polygamy, his accusations of adultery against the Savior, his railing, his curses or his insults — but upon the simple principle of faith alone. For faith has the power to wipe out any sin by the precious blood of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, but without faith we are lost.
The man who wrote this, Alan Fimister, is an Assistant Professor, Saint John Vianney Theological Seminary. What’s most interesting in this story are the comments from Lutherites (who may or may not be Lutherans) who seem to extrapolate from the fact Luther might be in Hell to the conclusion that all protesting Christians are going to Hell, and that it’s the Catholic Church which is sending them there, neither of which follows, and which Fimister doesn’t claim. There is also a strain condemning “dogmatism”, which is always a fallacy. What these people want is to substitute their own dogmatism for Fimister’s. At any rate, God bless Fimister for his boldness, which is on constant display.
And, not only is Al Qaeda 100% fundamentalist-Sunni, but so too is ISIS; and not only were all funders and participants in the 9/11 attacks fundamentalist-Sunnis, but so too were the Tsarnaev brothers who did the Boston Marathon bombing; and so too are all “radical Islamic terrorists” except for ones whose terrorism is directed against Israel, because Israel does suffer attacks not only from Sunnis, but also from Shia. But Israel is a unique case. And, the entire U.S.-Saudi-Israeli alliance is pro-Sunni and anti-Shia.
So: the reason why Pentagon think-tanks and the Pentagon itself and all U.S. Administrations play down the dangers and evils of fundamentalist Sunnis, and vastly exaggerate the dangers and evils of all Shia, is that the U.S. aristocracy, and the fundamentalist-Sunni aristocracies, and the Israeli aristocracy, are allied together against Shia, and against the major ally of Shia, namely Russia. Protecting the public is irrelevant, to each of these aristocracies, including the U.S. aristocracy.
These days ‘Think Tank’ is a singularly inapt name. Especially given this: In Shocking, Viral Interview, Qatar Confesses Secrets Behind Syrian War: “In an interview with Qatari TV Wednesday, bin Jaber al-Thani revealed that his country, alongside Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the United States, began shipping weapons to jihadists from the very moment events
‘first started’ (in 2011).” Our own government funding (directly or not) the terrorists? Golly.
Now however, just 72 per cent of married couples adopt the groom’s surname, compared to more than 97 per cent aged 55 or over.
Of the 2,003 adults surveyed, 11 per cent confirmed they had compromised by taking a double-barrelled surname.
Forget the scidolatrous “study finds.” Western culture is rapidly becoming feminized, which explains all the “hurt feelings” laws. You know no thought has been given to this asinine “double-barrelled” naming craze, because after the offspring of Smith-Jones weds the issue of Miller-Stephens, we’d have Mrs and Mr Smith-Jones-Miller-Stephens. And their spawn might marry Miss Abel-Baker-Charleston-Davis to produce Mr and Mrs Smith-Abel-Jones-Baker-Miller-Charleston-Stephens-Davis.