We used to call these “This Week In Doom”, but except for our Summa Contra Gentiles series, I cannot stick to a schedule.
Item “California Lesbian Couple Chemically Alter Their 11-Yr-Old Boy As Prep For Sex-Change Surgery“. Picture of the oh-so-happy adopted boy is above.
Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel decided that their son should immediately begin transitioning into a girl at the age of 8 because postponing treatment might cause him to commit suicide due to persistent gender dysphoria.
Apparently they didn’t want him going through male puberty which causes a young man to develop a deeper voice, broader shoulders, and facial hair. I want to know what doctor signed off on this. How can you look at an 8-year-old boy and prescribe hormone blockers in good conscience? How can you not refer the child to a therapist to decide whether they/re just being a normal kid, or actually consider themselves to be something they’re not?
Satanic hormone blockers to delay and debilitate puberty we saw a little while ago.
If anybody asks what harm there is in gmarriage, show them this. Best thing is to pray for the confusion of these two disordered women and freedom of the boy.
Item “Doctors boycott British Medical Association over abortion vote“.
Doctors are boycotting the British Medical Association after it backed a campaign for “abortion up to birth”.
A number of doctors have contacted the press to express their shock at a new policy in favour of stripping criminal sanctions from British abortion law.
“Motion 50” was adopted at a meeting in Bournemouth last week by a two-thirds majority in spite of more than 1,500 doctors writing to the BMA to warn executives that it would damage the reputation of their union.
The doom isn’t in the boycott, of course, but in the increasing trend of “doctors” becoming cold-blooded killers. Maybe it’s the exposure to universities. Drives them mad, fills them with bloodlust. Who can say?
Item Thanks to Jim Fedako. Don’t call pregnant patients ‘mothers’: Doctors are banned from using the word over fears it will upset those who are transgender
NHS doctors have been told not to call pregnant women ‘expectant mothers’ because it might offend transgender people, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The astonishing warning comes in official guidelines issued by the British Medical Association to its 160,000 members, which says mothers-to-be should be referred to as ‘pregnant people’ instead…
…the BMA insists doctors should drop the word ‘mother’ when referring to pregnancy to avoid offending transgender people and to ‘celebrate diversity’.
The contentious call is made in a 14-page booklet called A Guide To Effective Communication: Inclusive Language In The Workplace.
This is official, mandated insanity.
Item This is from Time magazine. I’ll repeat that. Time magazine. Times change: “How to Keep Donald Trump from Spreading His Toxic Masculinity to Future Generations“. The writer is Jennifer Siebel Newsom the “Second Lady of California”, which proves why California is such a mess.
A nation of children is growing up today under a toxic leader. They’re developing and learning how to be adults. They’re curious about how to find their way in this world. And they’re looking for examples of what it means to “be a man.” We’re giving them Trump. In response to Trump’’ jaw-droppingly inappropriate speech this week to the Boy Scouts…
The non-ironic use of the phrase “toxic masculinity” is a sure and certain indication of ideological insanity in the speaker. Classify the person you hear or see using this as somebody to steer yourself and your children well clear of.
Mrs Newsom goes on to say, “I was hopeful that we were on the road to progress not that long ago. I thought this new generation of boys would grow up seeing girls as their equals, and I thought this new generation of girls would come of age expecting and demanding respect and seats at the tables of power…”
God help us if girls ever see themselves the equal of boys, or that boys see themselves the equal of girls. Then we’ll have idiot commissions telling us not to use the word mother. No, toxic feminism is the real problem. Tables of power forsooth. Newson does have four kids, though, so God bless her for that.
Child abuse is government sanctioned, especially in adoptions. The more damaged, destroyed children out there, the more future Democrat voters. Damaged for life means dependent on the government.
Why shouldn’t doctors suffer from the same bloodlust the rest of the world does? Doctoring has been more about money and less about caring for decades.
If doctors can’t call pregnant persons “mothers”, then I assume schools, children and everyone else is forbidden also. It will be Parent Fred and Parent Bob or Parent Sue or Parent Jean and Parent Joe from here on out. Children will use their parent’s first name rather than Mom or Dad. Actually, parent will be banned soon and replaced with “person” lest any kind of relationship be established. (Those of us living on the reservation saw this coming when babies were started in test tubes. It’s why we left the Brave New World.)
How can one complain about “toxic masculinity” when males no longer exist???
I do not ask God to bless crazy, destructive people for popping out offspring.
One would think the Catholic Church would be leading a four alarm charge against this Satanism. But, alas, sustainable environment is on top of their “cause” agenda in which abortion fits quite nicely, thank you. We are way overdue for divine intervention. Let us hope it comes soon.
Forced femization (aka sissification) is a popular and enduring sexual fantasy among BDSM lesbians. Pity the state of California gave these women a little boy to play with.
Then there’s the case of Jazz Jennings, another young boy that went on hormone blockers and claimed to be a little girl. Apparently he’s old enough now that he can go through re-assignment surgery only he can’t because the hormone blockers prevented his penis from growing enough for there to be enough of it to refashion into an ersatz vagina so he may be stuck forever in limbo, neither fully a male nor fully a female.
Camille Paglia has flatly said all this tranny stuff is a sign of our impending cultural collapse ala Rome.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8BRdwgPChQ
The British Medical Association backed a campaign to allow abortion up to birth.
Post partum abortion should be performed on those two lesbians for messing with their son’s hormones.
I like “jaw-droppingly inappropriate,” as a description of Trump’s speech, though I myself thought it was mind-blowingly mild.
Briggs ==> Re: Pregnant People
My wife immediately asked “Who is issuing these stupid orders, the COMINTERN?
Briggs,
When I consider that you got a Phd from an America university, I’m starting to believe that you are right about one thing the US school system is in deep trouble.
Do they give diploma in Cracker Jacks box or is the exorbitant cost of university only foes to guaranty that any student will get a diploma.
In your first item those horrible lesbian dared to adopt a deaf kid that someone like you would never give the hour of the day.
The author of your link suggest that the kid be sent to a therapist. Of course, any kid with gender identity problem is followed by a team of doctor, psychiatrist and psychologist. The choice is never the choice of the parent but of the kid. Parents can only consent to the medical treatment which no one takes easy.
Sylvain-
How charitable of you. And just how many children have YOU adopted?
Now we have the story of a transgender ‘man’ with complete female reproductive organs giving birth to a boy (the boy was called a boy because of its genitalia, ironically) and the media goes insane. It’s Thomas Beatie all over again. Gallup reports more and more people split on the transgender debate – of a poll of about 1,100 people – and more and more are identifying as LGBT younger and younger on the same site. We’re seeing a change in our population and no one is trying to stop it. Homosexuality is now seen as normal; how long until transgenderism is?
The problem demonstrated here is one of hysteria.
Where normal discourse is disallowed due to the fact that emotions, even fake ones, run high, for effect or for real and understandable reasons.
So that commenters like the previous one will continue to be fed by media on the left, pushing this and in large part by the reactionaries who think that satire is the way to go as opposed to careful rational thought. Satire is overrated and no substitute for sober consideration. Especially when every repeat of a story like this will spin off into the gossip ether and in my view needs to be a sober message rather than more demoralisation and doomsaying. Like I said, if it’s doom you believe in, stop moaning about it. Sit back and wait, you defeatist loser.
I am referring to the ‘rolling out’ of transgenderness as an axiomatic belief on the side of the doomsaying alarmists. They are rather in love with their theory.
In times gone by there were creatures called ‘unocks?’ there have been strange individuals always and there always will be. Just as there will always be peeping toms and flashers (although the latter have retreated to their computers, who needs a trench coat when you can use software.
So the real extent of this matter is unknown and you cannot trust your terrifying extrapolation of opinion polls as any bell weather of this problem. It is self limiting at best. The authorities allowing the scenario at the top in the picture is something to be concerned about if the tale is entirely true. Here, no children are subjected to any such thing. Only adults receive treatment or surgery unless it is somehow procured illegally. It seems that US law does not protect children.
Like I’ve said, Trump is your only hope on this kind of thing. The number of people indulging in this is vanishingly small and without the help of the media and then the response to the media this would go nowhere. Don’t play into the MSM’s hands and run about like chicken little all day long. Do something about the individual cases. The demoralisation effect on people here is telling. The left leaning media is having it’s way.
Call it evil, for that is what it is, to change the sex of your child. It is mutilation and it is also psychologically permanently damaging which is the worse, and the first leads to more of the second as well.
As to abortions up until birth, I will have to ask Tariq again, a dean in the university.
I know this sounds naive but I do not believe that there will be staff willing to carry out such procedures. Sorry, I just don’t believe it. ‘M not saying the story isn’t true, but the reality itself.
Joy,
“The authorities allowing the scenario at the top in the picture is something to be concerned about if the tale is entirely true. Here, no children are subjected to any such thing. Only adults receive treatment or surgery unless it is somehow procured illegally. It seems that US law does not protect children.”
They are starting hormono-therapy to prep for the surgery. she is now 11, normal age to start it. starting this young means that she will have normal female curves.
“Call it evil, for that is what it is, to change the sex of your child. It is mutilation and it is also psychologically permanently damaging which is the worse, and the first leads to more of the second as well.”
Transgender are already psychologically damaged from the way society and people like those on this site are treating them.
Which one of these is a trans woman.
1)
https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-b3348ef353bf0885953961979f9de4a6.webp
2)
https://19fefz3rea9ev6kjq2v9gncy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/andreja-1410×19402111111111.jpg
4)
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02359/Harriet-Harman_2359881c.jpg
Sylvain no,
It is one thing that people have their problems but that they want to inflict them on others and cause life changing damage is wicked. That they do this with a child which they have adopted and are supposed to love shows the depth of their obsession and depravity.
Children do not know about life or sex, they are also incapable of resisting influence and pressure from adults either by word or action. They are utterly vulnerable and should be allowed to have a childhood with a mother and a father. The court went wrong even allowing the adoption in my view. I’m still finding it hard to believe it’s true and that everybody’s done their job correctly.
It is a horrific case. That you still tell yourself these people are just psychologically damaged because they’re bullied at school or something is so weak and pitiful in itself. Even if it were true, it’s not a reason for more from the guardians.
What matters in a normal world is that children, the elderly and vulnerable adults are protected from the worst vices and dangers of society. It seems that ordinary people, men in particular, are now intimidated from speaking to or even smiling at a child on a train or in public when people are so hysterical about abduction and child abuse.
They’ve looking in the wrong place.
They do say that child abuse is more likely to come from within a family and this case is another which proves the rule.
Joy
”It is one thing that people have their problems but that they want to inflict them on others and cause life changing damage is wicked.”
What you call damage is salvation for the kid. Everything is done in the best interest of the kid, and to the request of the kid.
”That they do this with a child which they have adopted and are supposed to love shows the depth of their obsession and depravity.”
They don’t do anything to the child, that the team of doctors, psychiatrist, psychologist told them to do. They are not doing any surgery soon. At the moment, it is hormone blocking treatment. the child doesn’t go under surgery until he/she is 17 or 18 years old.
”It is a horrific case. That you still tell yourself these people are just psychologically damaged because they’re bullied at school or something is so weak and pitiful in itself. Even if it were true, it’s not a reason for more from the guardians.”
It is people like you that causes them damage in not accepting their difference. They know they are different. They don’t need people telling them they are stupid, sinners, going to hell (they already are). You have obviously very little understanding of how psychology work.
”What matters in a normal world is that children, the elderly and vulnerable adults are protected from the worst vices and dangers of society.”
We do agree on this fact though you are one of the danger that these kids and elderly need to be protected from because you don’t care shit about the harm you do. You don’t listen to who they are and what they want. You impose your choices on them.
And again the kid is not getting any surgery yet. this is 5 to 7 years away.
”They do say that child abuse is more likely to come from within a family and this case is another which proves the rule.”
Yes abuse is more likely at home and they are very frequent in very religious family.
Sylvain children don’t know best.
What is a child outside of their age?
What do you know about children and their competence and vulnerabilities?
Are they wise?
Are they competent to litigate without an adult?
What does immature mean?
Does your belief he must have been bullied overrode everything in your mind?
You said,
“They don’t do anything to the child, that the team of doctors, psychiatrist, psychologist told them to do.”
That’s your imagination of what happens.
Some cases as points of academic interest or through some other luxury are subject to a case conference. In this case, and I have been present at these in orthopaedics and as part of multidisciplinary ‘teams’. They do not have plural numbers of each discipline on tap unless the meeting is a teaching session.
Nobody has a ‘team of doctors (plural) and psychologists (plural) and psychiatrists (plural) in one case.
The child will have been seen by a chain of consultants who all are managed by the GP who is in centre of the spoke and wheel and is supposed to maintain sanity in the system of referral and medical management. Of course with enough money a person can see as many Drs as they like and stop when they get the answer they want.
Not that this makes a jot of difference to my conclusion on this but this boy is vulnerable even more so as a result of his deafness.
Deafness is a profoundly socially limiting disability and one which would lead to his social isolation and already this puts him at a higher risk for not developing normal social habits.
When I say people have problems I thought it was patently clear the reference was to the boy’s appointed guardians. They clearly have problems of their own but have now overlaid them onto a child in their care and that is wicked. That all you can think of is the child being bullied reveals a tiny perspective and a poor sense of priority on your part. In my imagination such little boy might well say, “I want to be a little girl like you”. But that mummy would say, “no you don’t, you’ll understand when you’re older.” No?
Talk of hormone suppression being benign is wrong. Talk of ‘normal curves’ is horrid. He’s a little boy until he is a man. Not all little boys are the like little men and it is wrong to think that if he is left to develop normally that he won’t turn out completely normal and girl obsessed like every other little boy.
There are rare cases of genetic growth defects and a thing known as gonadotrophin insensitivity (where babies which are really boys, are born appearing like girls) and are therefore mistakenly treated as girls until the pathology is eventually noticed. There are cases of generic growth defects where hormones are indicated.
Baby girls should be tested at birth for sex chromosomes as routine. Just as with the heel prick test, another very rare disease which if undetected causes brain damage by retardation.
Just to note I learned of the disease from a source which I took on trust so my last point is based on that being true.
Sylvain,
Those links?
Number one doesn’t work and I’ve probably caught some computer disease now.
Two and three are the same person and he needs his roots done
It’s clearly a man because of the facial bones around the jaw and the ‘I’m going to eat you’ look in his eye.
Nice blouse though. I saw a ruffle neck one in vogue yesterday while I was at JF by Berry.com You’ve reminded me to look it up.
Number four is an older lady and she has a more genuine look in her eye.
Am I right?
Modern female models have to be taller than normal which is not a feminine trait. With this trait often comes a more manly athletic bone structure throughout. We’re all used to seeing this in glossy magazines but none of that is really relevant to the discussion on sex change surgery is it?
The ‘Adam’s apple’ (there’s irony) is usually the giveaway!
Everything anyone needs to know about you, you have perfectly expressed in the phrase “God help us if little girls ever see themselves as the equal of boys.” You really want a world where women know their place and that place is inferior to all men. I imagine you let your wife know every day how lucky she is to be with you and that you keep track of every tiny failing of hers and that you remind her several times each day.