Stream: Normalizing Incest and Other Perversions: It’s Already Happening
Now you might think that 19-year-old Natasha had sex, “sex [that] was intense in a way that no other sex has been”, with her father because she was lacking a father figure in her life.
Not so.
“My mom’s long-term partner was a patriarchal butch lesbian, so I already had a ‘father figure’ in my immediate family,” she said.
Surprisingly, this “patriarchal butch lesbian” father figure was abusive, so Natasha went in search of her actual father, who she discovered and then bedded in Jamaica.
Cosmopolitan UK gives us the dry, clinical name for Natasha’s behavior: Genetic Sexual Attraction.
It can’t be long until we hear, “Don’t worry. It isn’t incest, it’s GSA. And I was born this way.”
Sooner than you think. The magazine says GSA is a “real topic of discussion at the moment, with numerous stories of long-lost family members who reunited only to discover an intense sexual attraction, being bandied about all over the place.”
In a separate (and vivid) article about another woman having sex with her father, the magazine tells us GSA was “coined by a woman called Barbara Gonyo years ago, when she felt an overwhelming sense of sexual desire after being reunited with her birth son, Mitch, who was adopted as a baby.”
England’s Telegraph says, “Disgusted by incest? Genetic Sexual Attraction is real and on the rise.” In that article is a large picture with the words “I’m in love with my son and I want to have his baby.”
The blog Full Marriage Equality tells those experiencing GSA “You are not alone” and “You are not crazy or wrong for having these feelings.” Why? Because “there is no good reason why adults should feel a need to refrain from being together in whatever way they want.”
Folks in this category are calling themselves “The GSA Community”, and there is (of course) an online discussion group.
Disorientations
Besides homosexuality, pedophilia, and objectum sexuality, GSA is only one of the new sexual “orientations” with which we are becoming familiar.
An increasingly frequent argument is to call somebody “transphobic” if they would reject sex with somebody suffering gender dyhphoria. Having a “genital preference” is frowned upon.
Bestiality
Zoophilia (bestiality) is now not uncommon. […]
Necrophilia
Perhaps most disturbing […]
A New Reaction
[…]
Don’t tell CNN, but do click on over.
Nothing new is there? We have Oedipus who bedded his mother and even biblical examples: Cain and Seth who bedded their sisters and Lot who was raped by his own daughters.
Pornhub routinely releases its search statistics (I’d leave a link but every place I find the stats are very NSFW so I figure interested parties can search it out on their own … but y’all have been warned).
If you see what porn people are searching for you can get an idea what kind of degeneration is coming down the pike.
Currently “Step Mom” and “Step Sister” are among the top search terms.
If someone is “born that way” it has no bearing on the morality of the “that way”.
“Born that way” can never be proven but it is my view that a crucial part of that person is indeed “born that way”. To pretend that nature in the genetic sense produces no abnormality is to ignore self evident reality of physical defect or disease. One wouldn’t hold a disabled person responsible for their disability. So then the matter of behaviour needs to be seen with this in mind.
If a person is born without limbs, is that immoral? It cannot be considered natural in the idealised rendition of natural that we hear about rather too often.
Now then regarding behaviour. Some behaviour is illegal, abhorrent, criminal virtuous, honourable. Some is ‘proscribed’. This is not the same as ‘prescribed’.
Human behaviour is complex. The causes are not all knowable.
The strange notion that crime and sin are all equal and require the same treatment is another lie
put about by idealists. Like those who say nothing you do or don’t do is down to you it’s all God’s doing anyway! This is no different from the person claiming there is no free will.
The truth is more complex than either nature OR nurture. That’s reality for you.
As to Cosmopolitan UK, My Dad used to say “that’s pornographic” when I used to buy the stupid mags to look at clothes and hairstyles i’d never like. Now, only when at John Freida I peruse the pictures in each glossy in turn, far better than Cosmo. The dresses have improved greatly, far more conservative, and therefore sexier and feminine…Flowers too. Can’t read the txt but, Jake, the best hairdresser in the world, a sweetheart, reads the necessary and reminds me what is important. There is wisdom everywhere.
This video is interesting., on “born that way”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnBBqYFGKB8
Considering that republican are fighting the movement to raise the minimum age of marriage from young teen to 16 to 18.
Chris Christie push the idiocy to the point of vetoing a bill raising the minimum age for marriage.
Considering the lack of morality from your blog, I would be very careful of what I say.
I once heard someone described as “so tough and mean he’d f… a stone wall, just on the chance there might be a snake in it”. What sort of hyphenated sex should that be called?
Chris Christie push the idiocy to the point of vetoing a bill raising the minimum age for marriage.
Well, yes. He vetoed a bill that would make it illegal in NJ to wed below age 18. NJ current New Jersey law, which permits 16- and 17-year-olds to get married with parental consent and those under the age of 16 to marry with the approval of a family court judge.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/12/christie-vetoes-bill-that-would-outlaw-child-marriage-in-nj/
The age of consent in Canada is 16 — same as NJ.
Canada just raised it from 14 in 2008.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-s-age-of-consent-raised-by-2-years-1.754941
Get your own house in order before you complain about others.
Stop being a jackass.
Sylvain suggests “I would be very careful of what I say.”
Starting tomorrow I presume 😉
Hans Erren asserts “Lot who was raped by his own daughters.”
I believe a more accurate word is “seduced”. Rape suggests force or “not wanting it”. His complaint was that he couldn’t remember it. Or so it seems to me. He must have wanted it at the time.
I am curious if that mortician who said there were no health risks associated with raping a corpse knows about insect infestation, rotting flesh and the bacteria associated with decomposition? Or rigor mortis? It has come to this point where we have to explain, like we do with homosexuality, that not all sex acts are equal in pleasure and in health reward. As for incest couplings, I assume they also don’t know about pedigree collapse. Don’t Liberals mock us for being rednecks living in trailers who have sex with our brothers and sisters, anyways? I guess we can wear that as a badge of bride, now.
In other news, The Daily Mail had an article in which a doctor with over 30 years of experience argued in an ethics journal about giving burrowed (read: stolen) wombs from biological women to transgender women. The ethics around that is because of ‘equality’: it simply isn’t fair that transgender women ditched their natural breeding process and are denied female reproduction. The doctor argues that since British law recognizes transgender rights, they should be entitled to a womb. And these wombs will of course come from female donors.
Like the stories of sperm-less egg fertilization and egg-less embryos, they all end up relying on the environment of a woman’s body. Of course, with the pregnancy-obsessed transgenders, that involves treating real women as chattle to get what they want. And no one sees a problem with this, because they’d rather nod their heads and get along with their lives than see the issues in front of them.
Dav,
Since 2000, over 150k kid younger than 15 have been married, mainly to men older than 25 in the USA. This legalized raped.
I’m not surprised that an idiot like you still support to keep the law as it is. After it is likely your only hope to have sex. I mean by raping women.
Since 2000, over 150k kid younger than 15 have been married, mainly to men older than 25 in the USA. This legalized raped.
Still playing the jackass? Why am I not surprised?
You complain that a NJ law far more strict than Canadian law being rejected. Yet current NJ laws are essentially the same as Canadian laws regarding sex and marriage. Canadians must be idiots too by applying your “logic”.
I note you apparently parrot the NYT which lately has a rapidly falling reputation for accuracy. You’ll need something better than that Still, even the NYT belies your figures stating that 163 marriages less than the age of 16 occurred in NJ (requiring judicial approval) over a time period going back to 1995. If the same number were married in all 50 states it would be around 8000 — a far cry from your manufactured 150,000. Quit lying — it doesn’t help your case.
After it is likely your only hope to have sex. I mean by raping women.
Well, that surely has everyone convinced. You’re so cute when you lose and display your real self. Doesn’t flatter you though to say the least.
Here are some pointers which may help you with future posts:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201408/6-ways-win-any-argument
Try working on the first six points especially starting with #1.
Michael2: Drugging a person with the intent of forcing intercourse is considered rape in present day law.
Stop being a jackass.
Can’t. Born that way.
Romans 6:12 Therefore, do not let sin exercise dominion in your mortal bodies, to make you obey their passions.
Pingback: Normalizing Incest and Other Perversions: It’s Already Happening – William M. Briggs