WARNING: Don’t watch these videos at the office or around children. Don’t miss (below) the new Canadian law legalizing sodomy with 16-year-olds.
The documentary couldn’t have been that secret since YouTube has it, but there are elements in it worth noting. And then there’s this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfNeB6Hx7N0
And there is also this: 60 Minutes Exposing The Truth About Boystown (Breaking The Silence). And this.
There is also the horse’s mouth: the FBI itself. Child Sex Trafficking Crackdown Spreads to International Stage in 2016.
The two videos are given mostly as a reminder to myself, for future research, but also to indicate both the prevalence and difficulties prosecuting misbehavior (to use a neutral word) at the highest levels. This is of concern given the persistent rumors of similar misbehavior by our current would-be leaders, originally exposed by Wikileaks and the potential fallout from the same.
Are the rumors true? Bill Clinton did pal around with Jeffrey Epstein. Headline: Prince Andrew’s friend Jeffrey Epstein struck secret deal to ensure no ‘media frenzy’ over his conviction (this is from the Telegraph):
Epstein, now 61, was allowed to plead guilty to relatively minor charges of procuring minors for prostitution in Florida, in return for which he gained immunity from federal prosecution and the prospect of a far longer jail sentence. The plea deal was allowed despite the fact that the FBI identified 40 young women it classed as victims.
Among the publicly-available documents at the court in Palm Beach, Florida, are descriptions of how Epstein operated a ‘pyramid abuse scheme”, using his victims to recruit other under-age girls as young as 12 to become his playthings.
Tony Podesta’s taste in art isn’t proof, but it doesn’t speak well of him either. And, of course, he was invited to that “spirit cooking” dinner. Beyond that, there isn’t much to say here today.
It’s worth pointing out this headline, which fits these stories: Canada to repeal ‘discriminatory’ anal sex ban for under-18s. Those who enjoy youth will now be able to chase after 16-year-olds in Canada. Why?
“This section of the Criminal Code is discriminatory and the LGBTQ2 community has rightfully called for its repeal,” Wilson-Raybould said, as quoted by CBC News. “Our society has evolved over the last few decades and our criminal justice system needs to evolve as well. This legislation will help ensure that the system is keeping pace with societal change and continuing to meet expectations of Canadians.”
“Diversity and inclusion have long been among the values Canadians embrace. Canadians expect their laws and their government to reflect these values,” she added.
A fellow who presumably enjoys sodomy was quoted as saying the old law barring anal sex with 16-year-olds “discriminated against gay men.” The natural question is: does the new law, which bars anal sex with 15-year-olds discriminate against gay men? If not, why not? No, really: why not?
We are forced to play How Low Can You Go. Would a law banning anal sex with 14-year-olds discriminate against gay men? If not, why not? 13-year-olds? 12? 11? Where do we stop? You tell me.
It’s a busy day and, as I say, these are just notes.
All the result of the slippery slope of gmarriage.
All the results of having silly rules. Look, we taught kids “Heather has Two Mommies” was fine. So why not “Heather has a 25 year old sugar daddy” for the teen crowd, “Child Love—Just another way to say we love you” for the younger crowd, “My Funfilled Life as a Child Prostitute”, etc. After all, the heart wants what the heart wants.
If there were not silly rules or morals, all of these things would just be part of life and everyone would be very, very happy. Utopia awaits.
With regards to Podesta, there’s actually a bit more on him than that. He’s linked to “pizzagate”, involving a pizza place suspected of being a front for pedo and child trafficking activities.
” The natural question is: does the new law, which bars anal sex with 15-year-olds discriminate against gay men? If not, why not?”
No, the new law does not discriminate against gay men. Why not? Because the general age of consent for sex in Canada is 16 and that has not changed.
Glad you’re on the case Briggs, not because you’ll solve anything but I need a brain and a discernment which I respect which will blow away the chaff and opine on the veracity of these child-abuse claims. I’ve followed closely the Alt-media wikileaks, 4chan, and Reddit stuff. We have a similar situation in Australia which is more current than your links; e.g. the testimony of Fiona Barnett [ naming those you may recognize – Andrew Kidman [Nicole’s father] and Kim Beazley [Snr]] as well as ex-MP Bill Heffernan [who is using police evidence for his accusations]. I am in touch with Fiona and in regard to the scene in the UK I correspond with researcher cathyfox.com. I realize the U.S. situation will be enough for you, so I really hope you follow up and post your opinion.
ADDENDUM for further moderation. Requesting a favor: I would like to get back in touch with an old friend who has posted as a guest here [as Old David]. Obviously not ethical to supply his details, but could you contact him to ask him to email me at johnnamnik@gmail.com He will recognize my name. I have no objection to my own details being published. Many thanks.
Predictable pedophilia.
There’s been a lot of witch hunting in England since the revelations of Jimmy Saville. There’s so much passing back and forth of blame and attempts for people to seem virtuous….the crass phrase being ‘virtue signalling.’
Unfortunately innocent men have been accused of these crimes too. Those peddling lies should do the time the same length as that which the pedophile would receive. Just like false rape claims. It should carry a prison sentence but it would be complicated to put before a jury.
My father lived in Dolphin square as a boy in London and used to go to Saturday morning pictures. he said it was just known then that you don’t sit near the back or the fiddlers will sit next to you. If all the kids knew this, where were the adults? Answer is they didn’t care because people’s attitudes were different in those days. It was not assumed that the same people were likely up to far worse. Now it is impossible for society to accept that it isn’t always linked to far worse. Not all of this is healthy. The witch hunting and suspicion is another excuse to slam innocent people with a slur. Like the old racist word that now has worn so thin.
Truth is that Jimmy Saville was friends with a lot of powerful and influential people. We now have the pedophile spotting element on the right which is no better than the hitler spotters. So when he said I’m good friends with the pope what are we supposed to think? Spot another pedo or take it that much of what Jimmy said wasn’t true. Like all criminals, they are excellent liars.
This problem will never go away while men and even some women, apparently, have desires to be sadistic. All that can be done is patching and prosecuting.
There have been developments in the Jenner case which make this video out of date. It also has the strongest whiff of propaganda. Like the alien programmes.
Show me the convictions. As the judge said. Don’t listen to what the media tells you. You must only consider the evidence put before you. Acts of child abuse, as with all abuse, are too serious to handle inproperly , incompletely or with
special interest of ANY kind.
These two topics are among those that are difficult to talk about because emotion seems to rule. And yes, the topics in today’s blog post are two separate issues related only by involving sex.
The first is pedophilia. True pedophilia is likely an aberration of smaller demographic proportions than it has been made out to be. It’s become a popular pastime to see it everywhere. There’s even a TV program dedicated to it.
The second is sodomy. So Canada isn’t going to prosecute it. Presumably, the age of consent is 16 in all or most of Canada just as it is in the U.S. Why is this being discussed as if it is related to pedophilia? Filler? In any case, the government shouldn’t be in the business of telling people how and what kind of sex they should engage in.
“True pedophilia is likely an aberration of smaller demographic proportions than it has been made out to be.”
Yes, the term has been broadly abused by the general public, law enforcement and by Briggs here.
The word pedophilia originates from psychiatry and in that context in refers very specifically to sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
Being attracted to 16 year olds or even 15 or 14 year olds does not make one a pedophile.
pedophilia is sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
Wikipedia
Pingback: Outliers (#32) « Amerika
MattS nailed Canada’s ‘age of consent’ at 16 yrs (16-18 yrs in the U.S.).
Contrast that with the legal drinking age, 18 or 19 years depending on the province (21 mostly in the U.S., with some locales allowing down to 18 for beer & wine only [no hard liquor]).
Think about that — a High School undergraduate can “get busy” and start a family before they’re old enough to acquire a basic credential to enable them to get a menial job … but they’re simultaneously not considered under the law mature enough to drink alcohol responsibly.
Many of us see a certain fundamental “illogic” in that….
Yes, the drinking age is 21 so what is he sense in letting immature children vote before that age? “Many of us see a certain fundamental ‘illogic’ in that….”