Skip to content

Let’s Talk About Q Again — Guest Post by The Blonde Bombshell

We talked about Q a little bit a few months ago but it’s time for a second look.

Since late October 2017, Q has been communicating with members of the public who were and are willing to listen. At this writing, there are over 1900 drops, or messages, that Q has made available. This communication circumvents the regular media channels, and up until about a week ago, the mainstream media behaved as if Q did not exist.

For ten months the media were silent as tantalizing info was being released, free for the taking. Instead, they seized on nonsense stories and spent endless hours chatting about characters like Michael Wolff (my, wasn’t that short-lived?) and Stormy Daniels and fantasizing scenarios where the increasingly frail and ill-looking Hillary would assume the throne. Now their collective laser pointer is fixated on Omarosa, which practically guarantees zero reporting of substance is in the offing.

This last week, the media came out of their shell and released coordinated hit pieces on Q and Q followers, who were painted as disgruntled tea party members or as having some kind of psychological disorder that allow them to hear the voice of Q. Never mind that Q speaks to tens of thousands of patriots, not just in the United States, but worldwide.

The media’s sudden show of concern for Q is a disingenuous. There is a high likelihood that the media were aware of Q and followed Q as avidly as his keenest supporters, but for whatever reason, they took the code of omerta. If they wanted to discredit Q, it would have been easier to do so last November, when information was thin, when attention spans were shorter, and and when evidence in support of Q was not nearly as robust as it is today.

One interesting thing about this recent attack is that Bill Maher jumped on the anti-Q bandwagon, playing it as a LARP.

Q responded by posting a picture of the talk-show host wearing red shoes with images and URLs linking the Podesta Group and the Wikileaks emails (drop 1909). Q exercised restraint and did not bring up Maher’s sex-club habits, mention his particular predilections, or post pictures of him wearing completely ridiculous garb that bring to mind the excesses of celebrity pedophile Jimmy Savile. Q followers did the digging and revealed Bill Maher, in the best case, to be a virtue-signaling hypocrite.

What happened next? Maher publicly chided his fellow progressives and came out fully for the support for free speech with regard to the censoring of Alex Jones.

Message received, shall we say?

Other topics that Q takes on: The UK, along with Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the US form the “Five Eyes” alliance. Briefly stated, if a country could not by law spy on its own citizens, it could ask another country to do the deed for them. The favor is then returned. This is relevant to the Steele Dossier and the FISA warrant to “wiretap” Trump and his allies.

In drop 1164 Q asks:

Re_read Five Eyes.
Avoid data collection laws.
Public: Dossier.
Not Public: Five Eyes UK/AUS targeting using pushed RUS decoy meetings / campaign insertions.
HRC Brennan Clapper NAT WH SIT RM UK assist/set up.
Q

Intriguing, isn’t it?

If gamers had trouble with their Xbox last week, Q (post 1901) suggests that it was intentional. Among the variety of ways that 17 Angry Democrats (named so in Trump’s tweets) communicated with each other was to use PlayStation and Xbox chat functions, along with Ham radio (à la Nellie Ohr) and using Gmail drafts (à la Al Qaeda: using shared log-in information and passwords but not pressing “send”).

The breadth of topics that Q takes on is staggering. Sometimes a newcomer will parachute into the Reddit board and say something like, “Hi, I’m new here. Can you catch me up?” The answer is no. There is no way to succinctly summarize ten months of data and unwind its meaning.

If you would like to learn more about Q, the best thing to do is to make a pot a coffee and go to: Qanon Posts. The most recent drops are at the top, and oldest at the bottom.

The Great Awakening Reddit board is here. There is a lot of information in the sidebar, and as you get going you will have your own pattern of looking at things.

The Reddit board is not a straight Q board. The moderators try to keep it Q focused and sometimes they are overzealous in weeding out potentially interesting information. On the Reddit board, people ask questions and post interesting connections they’ve found in the course of their own research. There is also some speculation that can get more than a little crazy, and users try to warn their fellow followers to tone it down. This is the nature of things. For instance, in post 1082, Q said:

POTUS & JR.
Relationship.
Plane crash 1999.
Senate 2000.
The “Start.”
Enjoy the show.
Q

This “JR” is JFK JR, and it will be remembered he wanted to get this feet wet in politics, but someone else had designs on that Senate seat. It should also be remembered that Trump and JFK JR were pals. The board went into spasms when a man and a woman at one of the Trump rallies looked like they maybe, could possibly, if you squint, be JFK JR, alive still, and his bride, Carolyn. While the probability of such a sweet miracle happening is nearly zero, the frisson on the board was palatable and infectious. People are so hungry for information they can get carried away.

The other and opposite mistake that people make is to view incidents of news as being entirely separate and not connected. By viewing current events as morsels, they can be thoughtlessly swept off the table at the end of the day. In the morning there will be a fresh batch of news, entirely unconnected to events reported the day before, and the cycle begins again. Day after day, the public, docile and unwitting, see no connection, no thread, no narrative.

Q tries to show what’s behind the news. It also is important to note that Q followers are not all Republicans or all Trump supporters. Q followers are interested in the truth, liberty, and justice.

Is Q real? As I said before, Q as a phenomenon is real. There is a real Q, and whatever that Q is, one person or many, they are real, and they are posting. Is the information Q posts genuine? Look and find out. I don’t know who Q is, and I don’t want Q revealed. But I believe that he is realer than Santa Claus.

As Q would say, WWG1WGA. Where We Go One, We Go All. There is a story here, but you are going to have to figure it out.

(There have been no new drops responding to the latest Cohen situation. However you may see this.)

6 thoughts on “Let’s Talk About Q Again — Guest Post by The Blonde Bombshell Leave a comment

  1. B. BShell’s observation and response is telling: “… [I] don’t know who Q is, and I don’t want Q revealed. But I believe that he is realer than Santa Claus” are designed to preserve a mystery to allow one to assign baseless meaning where there is no meaning. Self-imposed “blinders.”

    That’s like people who ascribe profound meaning to the weekend paper’s astrological predictions — consider http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dp2Zqk8vHw. Or, the dimwitted followers of Forest Gump, who literally follow him everywhere after imputing similarly baseless wisdom to the gentle good-natured idiot who provided absolutely no basis for reaching such a conclusion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKKmzmeU5-0

    Men in Black (movie) parodied this inclination of so many to see meaning where none exists: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYQSBOMpb3Q

    Ascribing profound meaning to “Q” (“QAnon”) — when nobody has any idea of that source’s credibility, and to willfully choose to remain ignorant of that basic insight and choose to build upon such absolute ignorance a conclusion of profundity — is to conduct yourself every bit as stupidly as those followers of Forrest Gump.

    Don’t do that.

  2. Q differs from Gump in that Q asks leading questions while Gump just acts.

    Asking leading questions is deliberate, a design to get people to come to a specific set of conclusions the questioner wants them to arrive at.

    Just acting is not designed so the people come to any kind of predesigned results. Gump doesn’t even understand why people are following him.

    This of course says nothing about the real nature of Q, but it is clear that people see patterns because the patterns are there by design.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *