Here are the prediction of events following the Cologne (and other cities) sexual assaults: more “migrants” will be admitted to Germany, more attacks (of various kinds and not entirely sexual) will occur but we’ll hear less of them. Germany, like all post-Christian democracies, is doomed. The only question is timing.
That we’ll hear less of attacks by “migrants” is assured, and the easiest prediction. Indeed, the only thing of real surprise in this was that Reality slipped one past the Diversity goalie. Word got out and around the globe, fast. That will not be allowed to happen again. From now, crimes committed by, say, fewer than five “migrants” will never see daylight. Newsworthy incidents, caused by, say, five or more “migrants”, will still be reported, but only locally and drenched in euphemism, much like in the States when we hear on local television and for one day that “youths” have sacked a mall (or worse).
My guess of the euphemism to be employed in Europe will be the dry “young men”, which can also be applied to non-“migrant” men. This is a clever trick, because when, as is inevitable, a non-“migrant” man commits an atrocity, his picture and description as a “young man” can be widely circulated, thus giving the impression that this is what “young men” look like.
Don’t forget the police in Cologne initially issued a press release saying it has been a “peaceful” New Year’s Eve. They only recanted after intense pressure. The poor police chief who ordered that cover up was thrown under the bus, but only because he was caught.
Bild is already reporting that police forces are “under orders not to report crimes involving refugees to the press.” One cop was quoted, “‘There are strict orders from the chiefs not to report offences by refugees,’ the unnamed officer said. ‘We are only allowed to answer if journalists ask specifically about such incidents.'”
Too, the line diversitites are already taking is…wait, what’s a diversitite? A person who dwells in the ever-sunny Land of Diversity. Anyway, the line diversitites are taking is to say, grudgingly, that unfortunate things happened in Cologne and elsewhere, but that, really, these unfortunate things happen all the time men, “migrant” or non-“migrant”, are allowed to roam free. And when you think of it, they say, non-“migrant” men are worse. Pity the poor “young male migrants [who are] exchanging life under repressive regimes, where they…have enjoyed superiority over women” and now who are “scraping by at the bottom of Europe’s social and economic food chain. It is not madness to ask if this has anything to do with attacks that render confident, seemingly lucky young women humiliated and powerless” (source; The Guardian, naturally).
Plus, we have all heard the advice from the Cologne mayor, since repeated and amplified elsewhere, that it was wrong of mädchen to entice the “migrants”, who were pushed beyond the bounds of endurance. Be nice and keep away, say authorities, or dress such that “migrants” can’t tell if you’re female. No slut walks are scheduled for Cologne.
Incidentally, from all the available information we may conclude that the wave of false accusations and exaggerations on American college campuses are the product of a rape culture. And we may also conclude that the wave of actual rapes and sexual assaults whenever “migrants” gather are the product of, not rape culture, but systematic racism—on the part of those raped.
Recall the Rotherham rape scandal? “Migrants”, many of whom were British citizens, had a sort of rape culture club, into which an untold number of non-“migrant” girls were systematically inducted. It was allowed to flourish because non-“migrant” citizens and officials did not want to be called racist. But the funniest thing—you do have to laugh—was that the city, long after the facts were known, sought to ban “anti-child rape protests“.
Fear of being called a “racist.” Recall San Bernardino? The neighbors of the “radicalized” “migrant” neighbor didn’t want to be called “racists”, either. And—
Oh, but that’s enough. If you’re not convinced by now, you’re a diversitite and congenitally unable to hear the sad song of Reality.
Why is Germany doomed? Many reasons beyond the “migrants”, of course, but also because of them. See, the plan of German diversities was to open their doors to all and sundry “migrants” and then inject those “migrants” with the Progressive virus hoping it would take its inevitable, debilitating toll. But diversitites have never realized there are two effective inoculations against progressivism: Realism and Religion. Of course, the efficacy of the inoculation depends on the strains used, but you get the idea.
Most “migrants” are well protected against progressivism; thus, these “migrants” will never be diversitites; they will insist on playing the game by their own rules. And they will meet little resistance because the inoculation non-“migrants” can have for free, they reject. In the end, because Germany is a democracy, it’s a numbers game. When the “migrants” reach critical mass, they’ll vote themselves in and the diversitites out. Right Hamtramck? Doesn’t the call to prayer sound sweet?
Update After writing this, I saw Ed Feser’s mandatory reading, “Liberalism and Islam“. He amplifies and explains fully the point that progs hope to infect “migrants”, but that “migrants” are immune.
I also saw reports indicating Germany will take in another 8-10 million “migrants”, which will put their total at about 12% of the population, plus or minus. A substantial minority; more than enough to do the job. You also have to enjoy Germany’s efforts to salt “migrants” roughly evenly throughout the country. This was decided, almost certainly, because officials thought the prog virus would take easier. Instead, “migrant” culture will be everywhere.