
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CONTEST: Preliminary Discussion of the  &#8220;Best Internet Conspiracy Theory&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/</link>
	<description>"All manner of statistical analyses cheerfully undertaken."</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wadsworth</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4408</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wadsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4408</guid>
		<description>I've done one &lt;a href="http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2008/04/prodi-declines-putins-offer-of-top-post.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done one <a href="http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2008/04/prodi-declines-putins-offer-of-top-post.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>Boy Oh Boy!!! I've got my tinfoil hat ready and am ready to sniff chemtrails.......what a great idea!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy Oh Boy!!! I&#8217;ve got my tinfoil hat ready and am ready to sniff chemtrails&#8230;&#8230;.what a great idea!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>I am looking forward to this because I was at the center of the conspiracy :)

Unfortunately much of the information has been lost over time, but a good portion is still available on the WayBack Machine. It is a doozy of a story however, however 150 words might not cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking forward to this because I was at the center of the conspiracy <img src='http://wmbriggs.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Unfortunately much of the information has been lost over time, but a good portion is still available on the WayBack Machine. It is a doozy of a story however, however 150 words might not cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3911</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3911</guid>
		<description>Briggs-- So, will plausibility mean positive or negative points?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briggs&#8211; So, will plausibility mean positive or negative points?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briggs</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3905</link>
		<dc:creator>Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3905</guid>
		<description>I had to look this up: "A link whore is one who solicits links to her blog regularly or seems/is desperate to receive links to her blog."

Actually, however, I was trying to read Digg.com for the past few months, and had to give up because every other link was something like "George Bush to be Impeached!!!" or "Obama has miracle cancer cure!!!" or "Global Warming blamed on Right Wing Conspiracy" or some such nonsense.  So I thought I would try to come up with &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; best conspiracy.

This will save a lot of people a lot of time, and free the internet from nonsense for all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to look this up: &#8220;A link whore is one who solicits links to her blog regularly or seems/is desperate to receive links to her blog.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, however, I was trying to read Digg.com for the past few months, and had to give up because every other link was something like &#8220;George Bush to be Impeached!!!&#8221; or &#8220;Obama has miracle cancer cure!!!&#8221; or &#8220;Global Warming blamed on Right Wing Conspiracy&#8221; or some such nonsense.  So I thought I would try to come up with <em>the</em> best conspiracy.</p>
<p>This will save a lot of people a lot of time, and free the internet from nonsense for all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderleun</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderleun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3901</guid>
		<description>A buck? Sure.

A link? Regroup.

Like the header. Like the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A buck? Sure.</p>
<p>A link? Regroup.</p>
<p>Like the header. Like the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming &#187; CONTEST: Preliminary Discussion of the ?Best Internet Conspiracy&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Warming &#187; CONTEST: Preliminary Discussion of the ?Best Internet Conspiracy&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>[...] Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog wrote an interesting post today on CONTEST: Preliminary Discussion of the &#226;??Best Internet Conspiracy&#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230;of MoveOn.org, based in the World Trade Center was about to sell this discovery and eliminate Global Warming, when the Oil Companies learned&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog wrote an interesting post today on CONTEST: Preliminary Discussion of the &acirc;??Best Internet Conspiracy&#8230;Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230;of MoveOn.org, based in the World Trade Center was about to sell this discovery and eliminate Global Warming, when the Oil Companies learned&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>Rest assured, I meant it as a compliment. Now I need to think of the best conspiracy theory.   

In the tradition of link-whore contests, you should get an artistic friend to make a cute icon that contestants can post on their blog to announce they entered. Then, you can make another one they can post if they win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest assured, I meant it as a compliment. Now I need to think of the best conspiracy theory.   </p>
<p>In the tradition of link-whore contests, you should get an artistic friend to make a cute icon that contestants can post on their blog to announce they entered. Then, you can make another one they can post if they win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbeeman</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>bbeeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>Gheezh!  It is hard to top a conspiracy with ExxonMobile and Ron Paul in the same paragraph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gheezh!  It is hard to top a conspiracy with ExxonMobile and Ron Paul in the same paragraph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briggs</title>
		<link>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/04/24/contest-preliminary-discussion-of-the-best-internet-conspiracy-theory/#comment-3896</guid>
		<description>Lucia -- I hadn't heard the term "link whore" before, but, sure, hell yes.  I'll do most things for a buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucia &#8212; I hadn&#8217;t heard the term &#8220;link whore&#8221; before, but, sure, hell yes.  I&#8217;ll do most things for a buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.464 seconds -->
